2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2018.8461065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MergeNet: A Deep Net Architecture for Small Obstacle Discovery

Abstract: We present here, a novel network architecture called MergeNet for discovering small obstacles for on-road scenes in the context of autonomous driving. The basis of the architecture rests on the central consideration of training with less amount of data since the physical setup and the annotation process for small obstacles is hard to scale. For making effective use of the limited data, we propose a multi-stage training procedure involving weight-sharing, separate learning of low and high level features from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, when FPR is lower, our method achieves considerable improvement in accuracy over these two methods. MergeNet [3] utilizes deep learning to discover obstacles, and achieves an accuracy of 85% when FPR is 2.0%. Although Our method is not based on deep learning, it achieves an approximate result.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, when FPR is lower, our method achieves considerable improvement in accuracy over these two methods. MergeNet [3] utilizes deep learning to discover obstacles, and achieves an accuracy of 85% when FPR is 2.0%. Although Our method is not based on deep learning, it achieves an approximate result.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are three main categories for visual obstacle discovery: the correlation-based methods [1][2], the segmentation-based methods [3] [4], and the proposalbased methods [5] [6]. The first type compares the relative positions between 3D points in disparity map, and classifies all points into obstacle and road.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table VIII depicts the comparison of time per image between our method and the previous method. Since [1], [2] does not provide complete information about the computing platform, it is difficult to make a comprehensive comparison. Our method is implemented in MATLAB and tested on a PC with 16 GB memory and an Intel Core i7-2600K CPU, and takes more time to process an image.…”
Section: Computational Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate the second issue mentioned above, a multistride sliding window scheme is proposed, i.e., a dense sampling proposal in the highlayer region, and a sparse sampling proposal in the low-layer region. Furthermore, to achieve a high discovery performance, we explore two appearance properties of obstacles: (1) the dissimilarity between the obstacle and road plane, (2) the dissimilarity between the obstacles and other objects. Then, an obstacle-aware regression model is designed to learn these dissimilarities and generate an obstacle-occupied probability map, which consists of a pair of primary and secondary regressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%