2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2820587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merger Imbalance and Returns in International Equity Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, our evidence is consistent with some behavioural models that predict an underreaction pattern where long-term returns continuations are expected (Kadiyala and Rau, 2004;Croci et al, 2010). However, our findings are not coincident with Petmezas (2009), Porter and Singh (2010), Danbolt et al (2015), Zaremba and Grobelny (2017) and Chuang (2018) who find Table 3. Acquirer's short-and long-term abnormal performance by listing status of the target firm and market valuation.…”
Section: Acquirer Announcement Return and Long-term Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense, our evidence is consistent with some behavioural models that predict an underreaction pattern where long-term returns continuations are expected (Kadiyala and Rau, 2004;Croci et al, 2010). However, our findings are not coincident with Petmezas (2009), Porter and Singh (2010), Danbolt et al (2015), Zaremba and Grobelny (2017) and Chuang (2018) who find Table 3. Acquirer's short-and long-term abnormal performance by listing status of the target firm and market valuation.…”
Section: Acquirer Announcement Return and Long-term Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Graham et al (2013) show that managers who initiate mergers and acquisitions are more optimistic and more risk tolerant. Other arguments are considered by Zaremba and Grobelny (2017) who suggest that managers are fully rational when the acquisition is paid with overvalued stocks although future price reversals are expected in the long run. In this context, Croci et al (2010) examine the interaction between market valuation and managerial overconfidence.…”
Section: Behavioural Finance and Acquisitions: International Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%