2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.01890
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merger rate density of Population III binary black holes below, above, and in the pair-instability mass gap

Ataru Tanikawa,
Hajime Susa,
Takashi Yoshida
et al.

Abstract: We present the merger rate density of Population (Pop.) III binary black holes (BHs) by means of a widely-used binary population synthesis code BSE with extensions to very massive and extreme metalpoor stars. We consider not only low-mass BHs (lBHs: 5 − 50M ) but also high-mass BHs (hBHs: 130 − 200M ), where lBHs and hBHs are below and above the pair-instability mass gap (50 − 130M ), respectively. Pop. III BH-BHs can be categorized into three subpopulations: BH-BHs without hBHs (hBH0s: m tot 100M ), with one … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pair-instability process immediately translates into a promising signature of hierarchical mergers in GW observations: if BHs with 50M m 120M cannot be produced by stars, they might well be the remnants of previous BH mergers. Possible caveats to this statement include envelope retention in low-metallicity population III stars, [52][53][54] stellar mergers prior to BH formation, 37,[55][56][57] evolution in detached binaries, 44 as well as accretion in either molecular clouds, 58 minihalos, 59 dense clusters, 60,61 or isolated binaries. 62…”
Section: Masses: Populating the Pair-instability Mass Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pair-instability process immediately translates into a promising signature of hierarchical mergers in GW observations: if BHs with 50M m 120M cannot be produced by stars, they might well be the remnants of previous BH mergers. Possible caveats to this statement include envelope retention in low-metallicity population III stars, [52][53][54] stellar mergers prior to BH formation, 37,[55][56][57] evolution in detached binaries, 44 as well as accretion in either molecular clouds, 58 minihalos, 59 dense clusters, 60,61 or isolated binaries. 62…”
Section: Masses: Populating the Pair-instability Mass Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of stars in binary systems, and hence the properties of BNSs at the time of mergers, have been the subject of numerous investigations using population synthesis codes (e.g. Tutukov & Yun-gelson 1973;Portegies Zwart & Yungelson 1998;Belczynski et al 2002;Voss & Tauris 2003;Belczynski et al 2007;Podsiadlowski et al 2004;O'Shaughnessy et al 2010;Eldridge & Stanway 2016;Marchant et al 2016;Belczynski et al 2016;de Mink & Mandel 2016;Belczynski et al 2017;Stevenson et al 2017;Giacobbo et al 2018;Vigna-Gómez et al 2018;Neijssel et al 2019;Tang et al 2020;Tanikawa et al 2020;Mandel & Broekgaarden 2021), coupled with either semi-analytical prescriptions for galaxy modeling and evolution (e.g. Perna & Belczynski 2002;Belczynski et al 2006), or with results from numerical simulations of galaxy formation (e.g.…”
Section: Population Synthesis Calculations Of Binary Stars Leading To...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Events in galactic fields are more likely associated with compact object (CO) bina-ries formed via stellar evolution from binary stars (e.g. Tutukov & Yungelson 1973;Portegies Zwart & Yungelson 1998;Belczynski et al 2002;Voss & Tauris 2003;Belczynski et al 2007;Podsiadlowski et al 2004;Eldridge & Stanway 2016;Marchant et al 2016;Belczynski et al 2016;de Mink & Mandel 2016;Belczynski et al 2017;Stevenson et al 2017;Giacobbo et al 2018;Vigna-Gómez et al 2018;Belczynski et al 2018;Spera et al 2019;Tanikawa et al 2020), whereas mergers in globular clusters (e.g. Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2000;Downing et al 2010;Samsing et al 2014;Rodriguez et al 2015Rodriguez et al , 2016Askar et al 2017;Samsing 2018;Rodriguez & Loeb 2018;Fragione & Loeb 2019;Fragione et al 2019a,b;Zevin et al 2019;Fragione & Silk 2020;Antonini & Gieles 2020;Mapelli et al 2021), young star clusters (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should use more advanced stellar evolution grids that consider higher initial rotation speeds, additional mass loss processes, and a range of initial metallicities (Z 10 −4 Z ), together with close binary interactions (e.g. Kinugawa et al 2014;Belczynski et al 2017;Tanikawa et al 2020a). Furthermore, more realistic modelling of the feedback process has to involve 3D hydrodynamics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schauer et al 2019b;Qin et al 2020), and gravitational waves from mergers of compact objects (e.g. Kinugawa et al 2014;Hartwig et al 2016;Belczynski et al 2017;Tanikawa et al 2020a;Liu & Bromm 2020a,c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%