2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mergers, tidal interactions, and mass exchange in a population of disc globular clusters

Abstract: We present the results of a self-consistent N-body simulation following the evolution of a primordial population of thick-disc globular clusters (GCs). We study how the internal properties of such clusters evolve under the action of mutual interactions, while they orbit a Milky Way-like galaxy. For the first time, through analytical and numerical considerations, we find that physical encounters between disc GCs are a crucial factor that contributed to the shape of the current properties of the Galactic GC syst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the stars in the metal poor regime show a large spread in age, σ age = 0.9 Gyr, and iron content, σ [Fe/H] = 0.24, a higher spread in comparison with the literature (σ [Fe/H] = 0.186, Carretta et al 2010b;Willman & Strader 2012). Large iron spreads in GCs can be explained by a scenario in which two GCs merge (Gavagnin et al 2016;Bekki & Tsujimoto 2016;Khoperskov et al 2018, and references therein). Gavagnin et al (2016) using N-body simulations studied the structural and kinematic signatures in the remnants of GC mergers with a sample of progenitors of different densities and masses.…”
Section: A Possible Merger Remnant As the Seed Of The Sgr Dsph Nscmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…We find that the stars in the metal poor regime show a large spread in age, σ age = 0.9 Gyr, and iron content, σ [Fe/H] = 0.24, a higher spread in comparison with the literature (σ [Fe/H] = 0.186, Carretta et al 2010b;Willman & Strader 2012). Large iron spreads in GCs can be explained by a scenario in which two GCs merge (Gavagnin et al 2016;Bekki & Tsujimoto 2016;Khoperskov et al 2018, and references therein). Gavagnin et al (2016) using N-body simulations studied the structural and kinematic signatures in the remnants of GC mergers with a sample of progenitors of different densities and masses.…”
Section: A Possible Merger Remnant As the Seed Of The Sgr Dsph Nscmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Lastly, 26 out of 31 N-rich stars appear to behave as halo-like orbits, intriguingly in the prograde sense with respect to the rotation of the bar, suggesting that they were likely formed during the very early stages of the evolution of the Galaxy (e.g., Khoperskov et al 2018), in a similar way as Galactic globular clusters. It is import-ant to note that prograde orbits have been observed before in the inner halo (Bonaca et al 2017;Fernández-Alvar et al 2018;Hayes et al 2018;Lucey et al 2019), as well as for other globular clusters (Moreno et al 2014;Pérez-Villegas et al 2018), however this is not yet well-understood.…”
Section: Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, these results demonstrate that those inhomogeneities appear to occur in other star-formation environments. Such stars have received significant attention in recent years, primarily because they are considered as evaporated from stellar clusters, and as such, play an important role in deciphering the early history of the Galactic formation process (Martell & Grebel 2010;Martell et al 2011;Carollo et al 2013;Fernández-Trincado et al 2015a,b, 2016aHelmi et al 2018;Khoperskov et al 2018;Minniti et al 2018a;Ibata et al 2019), as well as providing clues on the mechanism responsible for the ejection from stellar clusters and its relation with chemical peculiarity (e.g., Pereira et al 2017Pereira et al , 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where detailed measurements of kinematics are possible, rotation seems to be a common dynamical ingredient of NSCs (Feldmeier et al 2014;Nguyen et al 2018) and is also commonly found in a high fraction of GCs (van de Ven et al 2006;Bellazzini et al 2012;Bianchini et al 2013;Kacharov et al 2014;Fabricius et al 2014;Kimmig et al 2015;Bellini et al 2017;Kamann et al 2018;Bianchini et al 2018;Sollima et al 2019). The presence of internal rotation can be an indicator of their formation mechanism (Mastrobuono-Battisti & Perets 2013, 2016Hénault-Brunet et al 2015;Gavagnin et al 2016;Khoperskov et al 2018;Mastrobuono-Battisti et al 2019a) and can give important clues on their long-term dynamical evolution (e.g., Einsel & Spurzem 1999;Tiongco et al 2018). Fabricius et al (2014) and Kamann et al (2018) found that GCs with high internal central rotation are more flattened, showing that internal rotation plays an important role in forming the shape of GCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%