2009
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging ancient and modern DNA: extinct seabird taxon rediscovered in the North Tasman Sea

Abstract: Ancient DNA has revolutionized the way in which evolutionary biologists research both extinct and extant taxa, from the inference of evolutionary history to the resolution of taxonomy. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first study to report the rediscovery of an ‘extinct’ avian taxon, the Tasman booby ( Sula tasmani ), using classical palaeontological data combined with ancient and modern DNA data. Contrary to earlier work, we show an overlap in size between fossil and modern bird… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing ancient and modern DNA sequences using molecular techniques is a framework that has been used to decipher the population origin of species or lineages [4,5]. However, the DNA of most ancient samples is heavily degraded and its preservation depends deeply on different processes that take place after cellular death, including availability of water and changes to the environmental conditions in which bone or soft tissue preservation occurs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing ancient and modern DNA sequences using molecular techniques is a framework that has been used to decipher the population origin of species or lineages [4,5]. However, the DNA of most ancient samples is heavily degraded and its preservation depends deeply on different processes that take place after cellular death, including availability of water and changes to the environmental conditions in which bone or soft tissue preservation occurs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reconstruction of past species ranges is not straightforward, due to major differences in sampling availability and data quality between modern‐day ecological studies and fossil, zooarchaeological or historical records (Turvey, ). One source of confusion arises from the increased tendency for palaeontological research to generate taxonomic inflation through overdescription, which has led to some locally extirpated populations of surviving species being erroneously described as distinct, supposedly extinct ‘species’ (see Pregill, and Steeves et al ., for examples), thus hindering accurate reconstruction of past species ranges and the magnitude of human‐caused biodiversity loss through misperception of ‘pseudo‐extinctions’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, wider biogeographical trends and patterns of range collapse remain poorly understood (e.g. Fagan et al, 2005;Turvey et al, 2010), and ancient DNA studies have recently revised our understanding of spatial patterns of population extinction and connectivity for several seabird species (Boessenkool et al, 2009;Steeves et al, 2009;Ram ırez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%