2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics

Abstract: The variation among sequences and structures in nature is both determined by physical laws and by evolutionary history. However, these two factors are traditionally investigated by disciplines with different emphasis and philosophy—molecular biophysics on one hand and evolutionary population genetics in another. Here, we review recent theoretical and computational approaches that address the critical need to integrate these two disciplines. We first articulate the elements of these integrated approaches. Then,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of molecular evolution attributed CUB to both genetic drift (neutralist) (Kimura, 1968b, Kimura, 1968a) and natural selection (selectionist) mechanisms (Mayr, 1961, Mayr, 1967). Although the selectionist or neutralist theories are not exclusive of each other (Bilgin et al, 2013, Bulmer, 1991, Duret, 2002a, Duret et al, 2002, Lercher et al, 2002, Wagner, 2008), we lack a complete understanding of the relative contribution of these pathways with regard to the evolution of CUB (reviewed in: (Nei and Nozawa, 2011, Nei et al, 2010, Serohijos and Shakhnovich, 2014, Hershberg and Petrov, 2008). …”
Section: Historical Perspective and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of molecular evolution attributed CUB to both genetic drift (neutralist) (Kimura, 1968b, Kimura, 1968a) and natural selection (selectionist) mechanisms (Mayr, 1961, Mayr, 1967). Although the selectionist or neutralist theories are not exclusive of each other (Bilgin et al, 2013, Bulmer, 1991, Duret, 2002a, Duret et al, 2002, Lercher et al, 2002, Wagner, 2008), we lack a complete understanding of the relative contribution of these pathways with regard to the evolution of CUB (reviewed in: (Nei and Nozawa, 2011, Nei et al, 2010, Serohijos and Shakhnovich, 2014, Hershberg and Petrov, 2008). …”
Section: Historical Perspective and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in recent years, there has been a drive to integrate the fields of protein biophysics and molecular evolution in order to better understand protein evolution (Harms and Thornton 2013;Liberles et al 2012;Serohijos and Shakhnovich 2014;Soskine and Tawfik 2010). One technique that has proved particularly useful in this pursuit is ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing models of fitness landscapes based on the physics of proteins and other biomolecules has emerged as a powerful approach for understanding molecular evolution [14,16,[31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%