Religion and the Morality of the Market
DOI: 10.1017/9781316888704.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merit Economies in Neoliberal Times: Halal Troubles in Contemporary Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Field work in Sri Lanka in 2013. This is also documented in my essay of 2017 (Haniffa 2017). 44 Deeb 2006.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Halal Issuesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…43 Field work in Sri Lanka in 2013. This is also documented in my essay of 2017 (Haniffa 2017). 44 Deeb 2006.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Halal Issuesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This issue, however, was not foremost in the discussion regarding the halal certification process. For a fuller discussion of the halal crisis, see Haniffa 2017. When the halal controversy erupted in early 2013, there was no directive on halal by the Consumer Affairs Authority, or any other government body. The ACJU was accused -by the then-leader of the opposition, among others -of having no legal basis to provide certification.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Halal Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attacks against the Muslim community, which led to businesses, houses, and mosques being destroyed, were possible because the Mahinda Rajapaksa government tolerated the BBS and its ilk. Politics and cultural considerations rooted in Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism and economics have combined to unleash this Islamophobia (Haniffa 2017). But the ability of forces close to the government to operate with impunity was a big reason for the periodic, well-orchestrated postwar anti-Muslim rioting.…”
Section: Autocratization Under Mahinda Rajapaksamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those who consider the economic basis of conflict, Haniffa (2016, 2017), Nuhman (2016), and Schonthal (2016) should be given more attention. While not denying the involvement of religious nationalist organizations, they consider the economic factors (but not religion) as the primary motivation behind post-war communal violence in Sri Lanka.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Religion and Out-group Intolerance In Sri Lanka: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schonthal, what differentiates post-war religious nationalist organizations (from their historical counterparts) is that their claims are clearly business or capitalist in orientation, and religious out-groups are portrayed not merely as a religious threat but as forces “distorting and altering the patterns of production, consumption, wealth, demography, and industry in the country” (Schonthal, 2016: 111, 112). Haniffa (2017) poses a similar argument that inter-religious violence was mainly perpetrated against the out-group’s entrepreneurship and the trade facilities framed and precipitated by the logics of neoliberalism.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Religion and Out-group Intolerance In Sri Lanka: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%