2016
DOI: 10.3390/atoms4010009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merkuriev Cut-off in e+ − H Multichannel Scattering Calculations

Abstract: We present the results of positron-Hydrogen multichannel scattering calculations performed on the base of Faddeev-Merkuriev equations. We discuss an optimal choice of the Merkuriev's Coulomb splitting parameters. Splitting the Coulomb potential in two-body configuration space is applicable for a limited energy range. Splitting the potential in three-body configuration space makes it possible to perform calculations in a broader range of energies and to optimize the numerical convergence. Scattering cross secti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters x 0α , y 0α and ν α > 2 can in principle be chosen arbitrarily, but their choice changes the properties of components ψ α that are important from both theoretical and computational points of view [31]. In the papers [33,34] we have discussed the choice of the cut-off function and have presented some practical algorithm of how to choose its parameters efficiently. In the bound state calculations the splitting can be omitted, that is one can take V [33].…”
Section: The Faddeev-merkuriev Equations 21 Notation and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters x 0α , y 0α and ν α > 2 can in principle be chosen arbitrarily, but their choice changes the properties of components ψ α that are important from both theoretical and computational points of view [31]. In the papers [33,34] we have discussed the choice of the cut-off function and have presented some practical algorithm of how to choose its parameters efficiently. In the bound state calculations the splitting can be omitted, that is one can take V [33].…”
Section: The Faddeev-merkuriev Equations 21 Notation and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters x 0α , y 0α and ν α > 2 can in principle be chosen arbitrarily, but their choice changes the properties of components ψ α that are important from both theoretical and computational points of view [28]. In the papers [30,31] we have discussed the choice of the cut-off function and have presented some practical algorithm of how to choose its parameters efficiently. In the bound state calculations the splitting can be omitted, that is one can take V (s) α = V α and V (l) α = 0.…”
Section: Notation and Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= si n ,n 0 0 sin (ϑ (y α , p n )) + co n ,n 0 0 cos (ϑ (y α , p n )) (24) and using extrapolation. We obtain N ch solutions ψ α…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, splitting of the Coulomb potentials is done by an artificial functional parameter in the three-body configuration space, the Merkuriev cut-off function. Recently, we showed in [24], that the splitting procedure can be made simpler and easier for implementing into FM equations. In this contribution we give practical advices for the choice of the cut-off function in the form of a smoothed Heaviside step function in the two-body configuration space, thus minimising the number of free parameters of the splitting procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%