1992
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19921570124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meromorphic Factorization, Partial Index Estimates and Elastodynamic Diffraction Problems1)

Abstract: This work is motivated by some elliptic boundary and transmission problems in mathematical physics, in particular by elastodynamic wave propagation. The analytical solution of the boundary pseudodifferential equations requires a generalized factorization of the lifted FOURIER symbol which is a non-rational matrix-function. In the factorization procedure poles and increasing terms appear, and cause enormous practical and theoretical problems due to the possible occurance of partial indices different from zero. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following results are mainly collected from [7] and [21], but see also [2,19,24] and other references in particular cases. Consider the WHOs (or PDOs) defined in (1.2).…”
Section: Proposition 62 Under the Assumptions (61)-(63) The Operamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following results are mainly collected from [7] and [21], but see also [2,19,24] and other references in particular cases. Consider the WHOs (or PDOs) defined in (1.2).…”
Section: Proposition 62 Under the Assumptions (61)-(63) The Operamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R). Meromorphic factorization appears in a natural way for some classes of matrix functions, for instance in elastodynamic diffraction problems [7,18]. This kind of factorization of matrix symbols does not give, as least directly, the same amount of information on Toeplitz operators as the Wiener-Hopf factorization defined above, namely as regards invertibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An example is meromorphic factorization [7,16] in which the factors and their inverses are allowed to have poles in the corresponding domain in the complex plane (C − or C + ) and algebraic growth at ∞. For a matrix function G ∈ G(C μ ( .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g*"r > [g>!g\, g>#g\]23[H\ (1 > )] are combinations of the given data defined on the half-line, i.e., HP (1 > ) are restrictions to 1 > of spaces HP"HP (1) of Bessel potentials of order r31. Further A"F\ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( #i t\) , (1.2) 31, t( )"( !k), which will be abbreviated by t for shortness, Im k'0 and "b> #b\ , "b> #b\ , "b> !b\ , "b> !b\ are linear combinations of the complex coefficients of the normal (b $ ) and tangential derivatives (b $ ). In (1.1) the unknown data > are distributions on 1 M > : (1.3) so that the zero extensions of the jumps of the Dirichlet and Neumann data on 1 belong to H (1) and H\ (1), respectively. The restriction r > to 1 > and the zero extension operator l to the whole line are defined on the space of distributions S(1) and S > :S(1 > )"S(1 > ), respectively [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%