1968
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(68)90030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesencephalic mediation of frequency discrimination in cats☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibly the association, rather than the primary auditory areas, functions to arouse the animal when, with continuing auditory input, a new input occurs. If this is so, then possibly the effects of cutting the brachium of the inferior colliculus may reflect impairment of projections from the inferior colliculus to nonspecific systems (Hoelle, 1968;Thompson & Smith, 1967), rather than the elimination of subcortical auditory centers. Jerison and Neff (1953) used monkeys in a single-response detection-of-new-frequency task similar to those used with cats.…”
Section: Frequency Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possibly the association, rather than the primary auditory areas, functions to arouse the animal when, with continuing auditory input, a new input occurs. If this is so, then possibly the effects of cutting the brachium of the inferior colliculus may reflect impairment of projections from the inferior colliculus to nonspecific systems (Hoelle, 1968;Thompson & Smith, 1967), rather than the elimination of subcortical auditory centers. Jerison and Neff (1953) used monkeys in a single-response detection-of-new-frequency task similar to those used with cats.…”
Section: Frequency Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been carried out with dogs in which performance on a go, no-go task and on a two-alternative, forced-choice task (either go-right, go-left or responses with left-foot, right-foot) was compared for two general types of discriminations, namely, cues based on direction of the signal source and cues based on spectral differences of the signal. In addition, the relative potencies of the spectral and directional cues were compared by combining them to determine which cue was more effective in controlling the discrimination performance (Dobrzecka & Konorski, 1967, 1968Lawicka, 1969;Szwejkowska, 1965Szwejkowska, , 1967). An interaction was found between the number of responses available to the animal and the nature of the cue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%