2004
DOI: 10.1002/fld.642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesh adaptation as a tool for certified computational aerodynamics

Abstract: SUMMARYMesh convergence order is a key for certiÿcation of the accuracy of numerical solutions. A few available results and tools in mesh adaption are synthetized in order to specify a mesh converging method for adaptive calculation of compressible ows including shocks or viscous layers. The main design property for this method is early second-order convergence, where early means that the second-order convergence is obtained with coarse meshes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We end this paragraph by mentioning that second-order convergence is also observed for flow calculations with shocks, see [19].…”
Section: Accuracy Order For a Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We end this paragraph by mentioning that second-order convergence is also observed for flow calculations with shocks, see [19].…”
Section: Accuracy Order For a Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this context, we can still wonder if using metric tensor fields to control such error estimates is a relevant choice. For the linear interpolation error, a lot of numerical examples for real life problems [29,24,35,28,66,27,60,65] tend to answer a rmatively to this question. In this section, this question is theoretically addressed and the pertinence of the use of metric tensor fields for anisotropic mesh adaptation is assessed.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Addressed applications are either steady or unsteady [3,23,5]. Metric-based mesh adaptation efficiency and genericity have been proved by many successful applications for 3D complex problems [3,11,18,19,23,45,50,51]. However, these methods are limited to the minimization of some interpolation errors for some solution fields.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 98%