2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-017-0564-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesh size effect on finite-element modeling of blast-loaded reinforced concrete slab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the mesh size affects every Lagrangian model, a convergence analysis should be performed before beginning the calculations. The element sizes of concrete (solids) and bars (beams) were 18 × 18 × 18 mm and 50 mm thickness, respectively, after this study and considering previous works by the authors [3,17,18].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the mesh size affects every Lagrangian model, a convergence analysis should be performed before beginning the calculations. The element sizes of concrete (solids) and bars (beams) were 18 × 18 × 18 mm and 50 mm thickness, respectively, after this study and considering previous works by the authors [3,17,18].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All aspects regarding these actions are included in "impact matrices" where they are identified as "hazards". Several hazards can affect the durability of structures, e.g., environmental, social and economic impact; population and consumptions growing; climate change (temperature and humidity) [72]; flooding; hurricanes; explosions of blast waves in the terrorist attacks [73] or in demolitions [74]; seismic hazard [75]; corrosion [76,77].…”
Section: Sustainability Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the solution is already good enough, smaller meshes will not result in big different solutions. Assuming that, in general terms, the results obtained with a finer mesh are better although some authors have shown that this is not always the case (Alañón et al, 2018). This technique provides some key advantages when compared with others: an analytical solution is not required, it provides a confidence bound on the estimated error band, and can be used with a minimum of two mesh solutions (though it works better with three).…”
Section: The Grid Convergence Index (Gci)mentioning
confidence: 99%