2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) method for the unsteady magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow through pipe with arbitrary wall conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid these oscillations the nodal distribution is again regular, with an aspect ratio 2:1, however, since the boundary layers are formed at x = 1and x = −1. The numerical results are compared with those obtained using the local boundary integral method (LBIE) [27] and the meshless-local PetrovGalerkin (MLPG) method [28]. The comparison reveals that, as time increases the numerical solutions of the proposed scheme for the velocity and the induced magnetic field tend to the exact solution of the steady state problem [3].…”
Section: Unsteady Mhd Flow In a Rectangular Duct With Insulating Or Cmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to avoid these oscillations the nodal distribution is again regular, with an aspect ratio 2:1, however, since the boundary layers are formed at x = 1and x = −1. The numerical results are compared with those obtained using the local boundary integral method (LBIE) [27] and the meshless-local PetrovGalerkin (MLPG) method [28]. The comparison reveals that, as time increases the numerical solutions of the proposed scheme for the velocity and the induced magnetic field tend to the exact solution of the steady state problem [3].…”
Section: Unsteady Mhd Flow In a Rectangular Duct With Insulating Or Cmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this way, it is possible the comparison of the present results with corresponding results of Figs. 2 and 3, obtained with MLPG method in [28]. Simultaneously, we can see how the Hartmann number and the conductivity parameter λ, affect the transition time to the steady state.…”
Section: Case 2: Conducting Wallsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these methods employ basis functions obtained by the moving least-squares (MLS) technique but, except the collocation methods, the requirement of background cells for integration makes other methods (methods based on weak forms) not truly meshless methods. Meshless local boundary integral equation method [22][23][24][25] and meshless local PetrovGalerkin (MLPG) method [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] are two meshfree methods based on weak form which are truly meshless methods and so do not require background cells for numerical integration. This is the main advantage of these method, specially MLPG which its integrals are regular in spite of meshless LBIE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Kadalbajoo and Sharma [5][6][7][8], Kadalbajoo and Ramesh [9], Amiraliyeva and Erdogan [10], Amiraliyeva and Amiraliyev [11], Rao and Chakravarthy [12] developed robust numerical schemes for dealing with singularly perturbed differential-difference equations. In recent years, much interest of scientists and engineeres has been paid on meshless based methods, particularly moving least squares (MLS) method [13][14][15][16][17]. In this paper, we employ a numerical method based on the MLS method to approximate the unknown function for solution of singularly perturbed differential-difference equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%