2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshless method – Review on recent developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach requires performing tracking on a regular mesh, constraining the location of the tracking points to the nodes of this mesh. To remove the need for a regular grid for computation, meshless methods, and specifically radial basis function (RBF)-based methods, can be employed to solve relatively simple mechanical problems with complex geometries from sparse source points ( Patel and Rachchh, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach requires performing tracking on a regular mesh, constraining the location of the tracking points to the nodes of this mesh. To remove the need for a regular grid for computation, meshless methods, and specifically radial basis function (RBF)-based methods, can be employed to solve relatively simple mechanical problems with complex geometries from sparse source points ( Patel and Rachchh, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the last few decades, there has been growing interest into meshless methods. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics [1][2][3], generalized finite difference method [4][5][6], reproducing kernel particle method [7][8][9], element-free Galerkin method [10][11][12], hp-clouds [13][14][15], partition of unity [16][17][18], finite point method [19][20][21] and radial basis function based finite difference (RBF-FD) method are some of the popular meshless methods. Meshless methods utilize only point clouds as a form of discretization for any domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This flexibility allows for better accuracy and reliability in numerical simulations and the ability to adjust the computational domain to fit specific solution requirements. Compared to the finite element method, commonly used in solid mechanics, the meshless method solves the limitations of the finite element method in terms of tricky mesh generation for complex shapes, low accuracy of stress calculation, and difficulty of adaptive analysis [40][41][42].…”
Section: Meshless Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%