2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoarchean melting and Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic metasomatism during the formation of the cratonic mantle keel beneath West Greenland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has important implications on how metals are sourced from the mantle to form ore deposits in the overlying crust (Begg et al, 2010;Griffin et al, 2013;Hronsky et al, 2012;Tassara et al, 2017). To date, few studies have addressed the relationship between HSE distribution in BMS and their petrography (e.g., Alard et al, 2000Alard et al, , 2005Alard et al, , 2011Luguet et al, 2001Luguet et al, , 2004Luguet et al, 2007;Lorand et al, 2004;Delpech et al, 2012;González-Jiménez et al, 2014;Saunders et al, 2015Saunders et al, , 2016Van Acken et al, 2017) in order to define the fingerprints left at the grain-scale by each different metasomatic agent that percolated the SCLM. Despite these advances, there are significant gaps in knowledge that limit our understanding of the impact of metasomatism on HSE mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has important implications on how metals are sourced from the mantle to form ore deposits in the overlying crust (Begg et al, 2010;Griffin et al, 2013;Hronsky et al, 2012;Tassara et al, 2017). To date, few studies have addressed the relationship between HSE distribution in BMS and their petrography (e.g., Alard et al, 2000Alard et al, , 2005Alard et al, , 2011Luguet et al, 2001Luguet et al, , 2004Luguet et al, 2007;Lorand et al, 2004;Delpech et al, 2012;González-Jiménez et al, 2014;Saunders et al, 2015Saunders et al, , 2016Van Acken et al, 2017) in order to define the fingerprints left at the grain-scale by each different metasomatic agent that percolated the SCLM. Despite these advances, there are significant gaps in knowledge that limit our understanding of the impact of metasomatism on HSE mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Re-Os isotopic system has long-proven to be effective in dating melt depletion events of mantle peridotites (e.g., Walker et al, 1989;Pearson et al, 1995;Shirey and Walker, 1998;Pearson, 1999;Irvine et al, 2003;Carlson et al, 2005;Rudnick and Walker, 2009;Liu et al, 2010Liu et al, , 2011Luguet et al, 2015). However, this isotopic system is not immune to the alteration by metasomatism and refertilization (e.g., Alard et al, 2002Alard et al, , 2011Ionov et al, 2006;Luguet et al, 2007Luguet et al, , 2015Rudnick and Walker, 2009;van Acken et al, 2017). Given that Re and Os are primarily hosted by base metal sulfides (BMS) and platinum group minerals (PGM) in mantle lithologies, the element systematics including the highly siderophile elements (HSE here including Os, Ir, Ru, Pt, Pd and Re), Se and Te, particularly their ratios such as Pd/Ir and Se/Te can be utilized to trace the signature of metasomatic overprintings and evaluate the potential impact on the Os isotopic system (Luguet et al, 2001(Luguet et al, , 2003(Luguet et al, , 2004(Luguet et al, , 2015Lorand et al, 2003;6 Alard et al, 20026 Alard et al, , 2011Ackerman et al, 2009Ackerman et al, , 2016van Acken et al, 2010a, b;;Liu et al, 2010Liu et al, , 2015Liu et al, , 2016König et al, 2014;Lorand and Luguet, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%