Background/Objectives: Cervical mesonephric adenocarcinomas (MNACs) are among the rarest neoplasms of the female genital tract. Unlike the majority of cervical cancers, which are predominantly squamous in origin and strongly associated with HPV seropositivity, MNACs are distinct in both histology and pathophysiology. Despite their unique characteristics, MNACs have historically been managed in parallel with squamous cell carcinomas, resulting in a lack of optimised, evidence-based treatment protocols. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the current management strategies for MNACs and their associated clinical outcomes. Additionally, we critically appraise existing surgical and adjuvant therapies and propose embryologically oriented surgical techniques to achieve optimal tumour resection. Methods: We performed a systematic search across the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from 1960 to June 2024. The search strategy employed a combination of keywords and MeSH terms, including “Uterine Cervical Neoplasms” [MeSH], “mesonephric tumour”, “mesonephric neoplasm”, and “mesonephric cancer”. All relevant publications, including case reports and case series, were considered. Results: A total of 49 publications were finally included in the analysis, involving a thorough description of 91 MNAC cases. Most patients had stage I disease (70.8%) (n = 51). Hysterectomy was performed in 77 patients. The median follow-up was 29 months (range 1–199 months). Disease recurrence was observed in 35.2% (n = 25) of the cases, with the median disease-free survival (DFS) being 24 months (range 1–199). At the follow-up, 64.8% (n = 46) of patients remained in remission irrespective of the treatment modality, while 27.4% (n = 20) died due to disease progression. Conclusions: Mesonephric neoplasms of the uterine cervix are rare and clinically aggressive cancers that signify poor prognosis. Accurate identification and effective management can be challenging due to their particular anatomic and immunohistochemical characteristics. Therefore, a more tailored embryological-based approach should be considered for an optimal oncologic outcome.