1985
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8634(85)90075-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of high solids cattle waste in a packed bed digester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methane yield of 150e230 L CH 4 /kg VS obtained for CM in the present study matched closely with some reported results [6,31,32]. A review of the existing literature showed that the two-phase digestion of cattle manure at an OLR of 3 kg VS/m 3 d and HRT of 15 days (3 þ 12 days) yielded 260 L CH 4 /kg VS and 47.1% VS reduction [33].…”
Section: Processsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methane yield of 150e230 L CH 4 /kg VS obtained for CM in the present study matched closely with some reported results [6,31,32]. A review of the existing literature showed that the two-phase digestion of cattle manure at an OLR of 3 kg VS/m 3 d and HRT of 15 days (3 þ 12 days) yielded 260 L CH 4 /kg VS and 47.1% VS reduction [33].…”
Section: Processsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In another study involving horse manure and soiled wheat straw, a methane yield of 170 L CH 4 /kg VS was observed [31]. Hall et al (1985) [32] reported a methane yield of 135 L CH 4 /kg VS for manure and spent wheat straw from cattle sheds.…”
Section: Comparison Of Single and Two-phase Systems With The Three DImentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although it is similar to other systems described (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11), it has a unique combination of design and operating conditions. This paper describes the general design and operating conditions and the results of a series of pilot-scale tests involving two different feedstocks and two different retention times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, a decrease in capital cost associated with the construction of bioreactors and long term storage. The costs associated with the handling, transportation and land application of bioreactor effluent is also substantially reduced [3]. In addition, the higher nutrients concentration in high-solids substrates increases the interest in agronomic valorization of the odorless bioreactor effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%