2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92735-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems: Introduction and Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
4
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While it has been demonstrated that mesophotic scleractinian corals (∼30-150 m) thrive under limited light and constitute a major component of coral reefs (Eyal et al, 2019;Pyle and Copus, 2019), the ecological and biological processes driving their distribution and population structure have remained insufficiently studied worldwide, including in the otherwise highly investigated mesophotic reefs of the Gulf of Eilat/Aqaba (GoE/A) (Turner et al, 2017). Although SFD is one of the most appropriate methods for studying coral demographics, its use to date has been limited to the shallow reefs and performed mostly at a single depth (Bauman et al, 2013;Anderson and Pratchett, 2014;Adjeroud et al, 2015;Shlesinger and Loya, 2019), or focused on only one genus or growth form along a wide depth gradient (Vermeij and Bak, 2003;Goodbody-Gringley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been demonstrated that mesophotic scleractinian corals (∼30-150 m) thrive under limited light and constitute a major component of coral reefs (Eyal et al, 2019;Pyle and Copus, 2019), the ecological and biological processes driving their distribution and population structure have remained insufficiently studied worldwide, including in the otherwise highly investigated mesophotic reefs of the Gulf of Eilat/Aqaba (GoE/A) (Turner et al, 2017). Although SFD is one of the most appropriate methods for studying coral demographics, its use to date has been limited to the shallow reefs and performed mostly at a single depth (Bauman et al, 2013;Anderson and Pratchett, 2014;Adjeroud et al, 2015;Shlesinger and Loya, 2019), or focused on only one genus or growth form along a wide depth gradient (Vermeij and Bak, 2003;Goodbody-Gringley et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their close proximity to well-studied shallow reefs, and their inferred importance (Rocha et al 2018), MCEs have remained poorly studied due to the technical limitations of diving (Pyle 2019). Basic data on the taxonomic composition, depth ranges, habitat preferences, abundance and distribution of MCE taxa are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the biodiversity of MCEs have indicated some preliminary trends that will be interesting to explore as more of the algal diversity in these deep-water environments is characterized. For example, fishes have been shown to generally have narrower geographic distributions than their shallow counterparts, high levels of endemism are suggested for all groups of organisms in Hawaiian MCEs, and the degree of shallow-to-deep connectivity has been shown to vary by taxon (Pyle and Copus 2019). Combined with the impressive diversity of peyssonnelioid species that have been described in recent years (e.g., Pueschel and Saunders 2009, Ballantine and Ruíz 2010, 2011, Dixon and Saunders 2013, it is clear that future contributions to mesophotic algal systematics and taxonomy will be important for under-from the hypobasal cuticle (Dixon 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%