2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous alumina infiltrated with a very thin and complete carbon layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon phase formed by CVD is therefore either nonporous or more uniformly deposited on the surface of the alumina, thus limiting the formation of carbon-rich zones or aggregates. The second hypothesis is preferred because it is in agreement with the results of Ilinich et al regarding C/alumina composites formed by ethylene carbonization . The average pore diameter decreases much more rapidly with the carbon content than for samples prepared by impregnation/pyrolysis (Table and Figures S11 and S14, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The carbon phase formed by CVD is therefore either nonporous or more uniformly deposited on the surface of the alumina, thus limiting the formation of carbon-rich zones or aggregates. The second hypothesis is preferred because it is in agreement with the results of Ilinich et al regarding C/alumina composites formed by ethylene carbonization . The average pore diameter decreases much more rapidly with the carbon content than for samples prepared by impregnation/pyrolysis (Table and Figures S11 and S14, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The second hypothesis is preferred because it is in agreement with the results of Ilinich et al regarding C/alumina composites formed by ethylene carbonization. 36 The average pore diameter decreases much more rapidly with the carbon content than for samples prepared by impregnation/pyrolysis (Table 5 and Figures S11 and S14, Supporting Information). This difference reinforces the hypothesis of a less homogeneous covering in the case of composites prepared by impregnation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FTIR spectra showed that Pdop covers the surface of Al 2 O 3 blocking surface OH groups, consequently, forming an adlayer between the support and the metal precursors. Note that in contrast to other preparation methods of carbon‐coated alumina,, the Pdop layer hardly reduces the porosity of the Al 2 O 3 support (Figure S11). When Mo precursors are added to Pdop coated Al 2 O 3 , the catechol groups present in Pdop complexes with Mo ions .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, more Co atoms are available to promote the MoS 2 crystallites formed during sulfidation. Coating the surface of alumina with carbon is another suitable option . Weakening the interaction with the support avoids the formation of catalytically inactive refractory species like CoAl 2 O 4 and Al(OH) 6 Mo 6 O 18 , but may also decrease the dispersion of the active phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ilinich et al [24] investigated mesoporous carbon infiltrated Al 2 O 3 with a relatively thin carbon coating. The obtained product had high electrical conductivity and resistance to acidic media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%