2017
DOI: 10.3390/ma10111244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Functionalized 3D Ti-6Al-4V Scaffolds with Improved Surface Bioactivity

Abstract: Porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds fabricated by means of selective laser melting (SLM), having controllable geometrical features and preferable mechanical properties, have been developed as a class of biomaterials that hold promising potential for bone repair. However, the inherent bio-inertness of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy as the matrix of the scaffolds results in a lack in the ability to stimulate bone ingrowth and regeneration. The aim of the present study was to develop a bioactive coating on the struts of SLM Ti-6Al-4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although BG has good potential for regenerate bone the concentration of boron released is still a concern. A similar conclusion was reached in another study [143]. In this study, it was developed and tested a 3D porous structure of Ti6Al4V coated with BG.…”
Section: Polymer Biomaterialssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although BG has good potential for regenerate bone the concentration of boron released is still a concern. A similar conclusion was reached in another study [143]. In this study, it was developed and tested a 3D porous structure of Ti6Al4V coated with BG.…”
Section: Polymer Biomaterialssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Metal implantable materials usually have both higher mechanical strength and ductility as compared to polymers or ceramic materials [5,6]. Therefore, metal materials are often considered as the first-choice candidates for bone tissue engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Gibson and Ashby model, introduction of different types of porous structures onto scaffolds can aid in reducing the Young’s modulus thus leading to adjustable mechanical responses such as elastic limit, yield stress, etc. Porous structures allow better bone ingrowth and formation into the scaffolds, thus allowing better material-bone integration [5]. Unfortunately, the inherent bio-inertness of Ti alloys has led to limited improvements in hard tissue regeneration, which may significantly limit their applications in some orthopedic procedures, for example, in the repair of segmental bone defects [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[314,315] Rough surfaces with micropatterns that approximate cell size (20-50 µm) also stimulate bone regeneration. [314,316] Because highly ordered microstructure is not apparent in biological tissues, a randomly varied distribution of spherical pores in the range of 400-600 µm is considered appropriate for bone regeneration. [317] The optimal microstructural parameters for conduit designs for nerve regeneration are 80% porosity, 10-38 µm pore size and ≈0.6 mm wall thickness.…”
Section: Architectural Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%