2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous carbon as an effective support for Fe catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to liquid hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Detail hydrocarbon product distribution obtained over (A) well-defined mesoporous carbon (MPC) supported Fe–K in the range of C 15–27 , 95 (B) Fe–Cu, 98 (C) Na–Fe 3 O 4 (middle), 105 Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HZMS-5 (left), 105 and Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HMCM-22 (right), 109 (D) ZnFeO x -4.25Na (left) and ZnFeO x -4.25Na/HZSM-5 (right) under the reaction conditions of 320 °C, 3.0 MPa, H 2 /CO 2 = 3, and 4000 mL g –1 h –1 , 107 as well as (E) FeK1.5/HSG|HZSM-5 (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 molar ratio of HZSM-5 = 50) catalysts during the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction. 110 Reprinted with permission from refs ( 95 ), ( 98 ), ( 105 ), ( 107 ) , ( 109 ), and ( 110 ). Copyright 2017 and 2020 Elsevier, Copyright 2017 Springer-Nature, and Copyright 2018 and 2019 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Co 2 Hydrogenation To Liquid Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Detail hydrocarbon product distribution obtained over (A) well-defined mesoporous carbon (MPC) supported Fe–K in the range of C 15–27 , 95 (B) Fe–Cu, 98 (C) Na–Fe 3 O 4 (middle), 105 Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HZMS-5 (left), 105 and Na–Fe 3 O 4 /HMCM-22 (right), 109 (D) ZnFeO x -4.25Na (left) and ZnFeO x -4.25Na/HZSM-5 (right) under the reaction conditions of 320 °C, 3.0 MPa, H 2 /CO 2 = 3, and 4000 mL g –1 h –1 , 107 as well as (E) FeK1.5/HSG|HZSM-5 (SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 molar ratio of HZSM-5 = 50) catalysts during the CO 2 hydrogenation reaction. 110 Reprinted with permission from refs ( 95 ), ( 98 ), ( 105 ), ( 107 ) , ( 109 ), and ( 110 ). Copyright 2017 and 2020 Elsevier, Copyright 2017 Springer-Nature, and Copyright 2018 and 2019 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Co 2 Hydrogenation To Liquid Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be overcome by the use of selective support. Metal oxides like Al2O3 [11], ZrO2 [12], SiO2 [13], carbon materials [14,15], CeO2 [16], TiO2 [17], and MnO2 [18] were used as supports to deposit the active metals for the study of CO2 catalytic hydrogenation.…”
Section: Co2 + H2 → Co + H2omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bimetallic catalysts, the refined biofuel percentages obtained from PF1, PF2, and PF3 were 74%, 66%, and 82%, respectively (see Figure 4). It should be noted that bimetallic catalysts showed a lower refined-biofuel yield than monometallic catalyst since the Fe catalyst increases olefin hydrocarbons including ethylene, propylene and butadiene better than refined-biofuel [13]. Crude biofuels obtained from hydrocracking reaction could be classified into three kinds depending on their boiling point: (i) green gasoline, (ii) green kerosene, and (iii) green diesel, as illustrated in Figure 5.…”
Section: Catalytic Hydrocracking Reaction Testmentioning
confidence: 99%