clean and renewable energy carrier, produced from sustainable and abundant energy sources, is a promising solution. [2] The combustion of hydrogen does not release any greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. [3] With focus on the photocatalytic production of hydrogen, the challenge is to find the right materials, synthesize them with the appropriate morphology and process them into a form that enables efficient photocatalysis. From a materials point of view, most of the research is dedicated to heterogeneous photocatalysis using semiconducting photo catalysts. [4] Kudo and Miseki compiled a large collection of different photocatalyst materials ranging from various metal oxides to metal (oxy)sulfides and metal (oxy)nitrides. [5] In spite of this immense compositional diversity, the largely available, cheap, stable, and nontoxic titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) is still one of the most studied photocatalysts, regardless of its activity being limited to ultraviolet (UV) light illumination and its unfavorable fast electron hole recombination. [6] In addition to the materials selection, the morphology of the photocatalyst also plays an important role, because a large surface area, which exposes many adsorption sites to the environment, is crucial. [3] Nanostructures with particle-, [7][8][9] rod-, [10][11][12] tube-, [13][14][15] or sheet-like [16][17][18] morphology provide a large surface-to-volume ratio and thus have been found to be ideal structures for photocatalysis. However, most nanoparticles are used in powder form, which has the disadvantage that such photocatalytic nanostructures tend to agglomerate and that extraction of the photocatalyst from the reaction medium for recycling is challenging. [19] Consequently, processing of the nanoparticles into thin films [20,21] or their immobilization on 3D, photocatalytically nonactive templates such as foams, [22] sponges, [23] mesoporous silica, [24,25] electrospun nanofibers [26][27][28] or hydroxyapatite [29] has been pursued. [3] However, a significant reduction in surface area and number of adsorption sites, both of which are detrimental to photocatalytic activity, is inevitable. [19] A solution to this problem is the fabrication of templatefree, macroscopic, 3D structures entirely made of the photocatalytic material. Examples along these lines include 3D porous g-C 3 N 4 , [30] mesoporous TiO 2 foams, [31] graphene oxide (GO) sponges, [32] porous g-C 3 N 4 monoliths, [33] MoS 2 /rGO aerogels, [34] CN aerogels, [35] or Au-Pt-TiO 2 aerogels. [36] Unfortunately, the Monolithic aerogels composed of crystalline nanoparticles enable photocatalysis in three dimensions, but they suffer from low mechanical stability and it is difficult to produce them with complex geometries. Here, an approach to control the geometry of the photocatalysts to optimize their photocatalytic performance by introducing carefully designed 3D printed polymeric scaffolds into the aerogel monoliths is reported. This allows to systematically study and improve fundamental parameters in gas phase photocata...