2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoporous MCM-41 material for hydrogen storage: A short review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The storage capacities of some highly porous MOFs [ 12 ] (>14 wt% under 70 bar, 77 K) are much higher than those of traditional porous materials such as zeolite and activated carbon (<7 wt%). [ 3,13 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The storage capacities of some highly porous MOFs [ 12 ] (>14 wt% under 70 bar, 77 K) are much higher than those of traditional porous materials such as zeolite and activated carbon (<7 wt%). [ 3,13 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption of hydrogen on porous adsorbents is widely studied for hydrogen storage applications at different pressures. In recent years, several porous materials such as activated carbon, single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT and MWCNT), zeolites, MCM-41 and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been proposed as good adsorbents for hydrogen adsorption [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Four methods for hydrogen storage can be anticipated: liquefaction, compression, physical sorption and storage in the form of metallic hydrides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCM-41, which is a type of zeolite, is a member of mesoporous adsorbents family. MCM-41 has good chemical, mechanical and thermal stability, high surface area, uniform mesoporous structure, as a result of which it may be considered as a good adsorbent for hydrogen sorption [6]. Sheppard and Buckley [11] reported that pure MCM-41 samples having surface areas of 916-1060 m 2 /g adsorbed 2.01 wt % of hydrogen at 77 K. Park et al [12] have reported that the H 2 storage of MCM-41 at 298 K and 9.5 MPa was 0.68 wt % when incorporated with nickel (Ni-MCM41).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in porous silicas based on CTA salts is rooted in the discovery of ordered mesoporous MCM‐41, formed by condensation of silica on micellar rod arrays of the surfactant (e.g., CTA + Br – ) , . Beneficial properties of this class of mesoporous silicas are the high surface area, uniform pore size and high adsorption capacity , . But, they usually exhibit a low hydrothermal stability and display low catalytic performance, which is mainly due to the weak acidity of the protons arising from introduction of Al in the amorphous silica network .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%