2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010jamc2415.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscale Modeling of Boundary Layer Refractivity and Atmospheric Ducting

Abstract: In this study four mesoscale forecasting systems were used to investigate the four-dimensional structure of atmospheric refractivity and ducting layers that occur within evolving synoptic conditions over the eastern seaboard of the United States. The aim of this study was to identify the most important components of forecasting systems that contribute to refractive structures simulated in a littoral environment. Over a 7-day period in April-May of 2000 near Wallops Island, Virginia, meteorological parameters a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upper-ocean mixing and advection affect EM ducting by regulating the SST variability, 485 which was identified as one of the critical factors for accurate predictions of coastal refractivity 486 (Haack et al 2010). Extensive upper ocean temperature, salinity and turbulence parameters were 487 sampled in CASPER-East from both ships as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Upper Ocean Measurements 484mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper-ocean mixing and advection affect EM ducting by regulating the SST variability, 485 which was identified as one of the critical factors for accurate predictions of coastal refractivity 486 (Haack et al 2010). Extensive upper ocean temperature, salinity and turbulence parameters were 487 sampled in CASPER-East from both ships as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Upper Ocean Measurements 484mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is compounded by the weak flows (low wind speeds) associated with air quality episodes. Some recent studies have demonstrated improvement with grids of 2.5-5 km by evaluating Lagrangian dispersion model output (Nachamkin et al 2007), ducting (Haack et al 2010), lake-breeze fronts (Makar et al 2010), or full-chemistry simulations (Stroud et al 2010). Below, we show wind speed and direction statistics to demonstrate that 12-km grid spacing is insufficient to capture coastal flows influenced by the complex terrain of Southern California, while 4-km grids do better.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bao et al (2008) and Michelson and Bao (2008) showed that errors in the initial fields persisted in mesoscale simulations, emphasizing regional-to synopticscale pressure patterns. Haack et al (2010) also found that accurate initial and boundary conditions were important for their simulations of ducting. Schoch et al (2011) found errors in their simulations of coastal weather in Alaska due to initialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above discussed evaporation duct model applied to an open ocean. To account for the spatio-temporal development of the ducting layers in the littoral zones [3,39,120], mesoscale numerical weather prediction (NWP) modeling [121,122] has been used to generate 4D refractivity fields. The generated refractivity profiles may be used as input to the PE model [12,39,122].…”
Section: Modeling Of the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%