2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.207003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscopic Competition of Superconductivity and Ferromagnetism: Conductance Peak Statistics for Metallic Grains

Abstract: We investigate the competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism in chaotic ultrasmall metallic grains in a regime where both phases can coexist. We use an effective Hamiltonian that combines a BCS-like pairing term and a ferromagnetic Stoner-like spin exchange term. We study the transport properties of the grain in the Coulomb blockade regime and identify signatures of the coexistence between pairing and exchange correlations in the mesoscopic fluctuations of the conductance peak spacings and peak … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the dots fabricated in 2D electron gas the interaction in the Cooper channel is typically repulsive and, therefore, renormalizes to zero [2]. In the case of 3D quantum dots realized as small metallic grains, the interaction in the Cooper channel can be attractive, giving rise to interesting competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism [18,19,20]. In that case we assume that there is a weak magnetic field which suppresses the Cooper channel.…”
Section: Hamiltonian and Effective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dots fabricated in 2D electron gas the interaction in the Cooper channel is typically repulsive and, therefore, renormalizes to zero [2]. In the case of 3D quantum dots realized as small metallic grains, the interaction in the Cooper channel can be attractive, giving rise to interesting competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism [18,19,20]. In that case we assume that there is a weak magnetic field which suppresses the Cooper channel.…”
Section: Hamiltonian and Effective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M kk ′ is defined in Eq. (22). Here, the manyelectron contribution (u k v k ′ − u k ′ v k ) 2 results in the suppression of the terms with ǫ k far above or ǫ k ′ far below the Fermi level, similarly to the noninteracting restriction k < k F ≤ k ′ .…”
Section: Bcs Formalismmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Each eigenstate of the universal Hamiltonian factorizes into a direct product of a fully paired state, i.e., a state in which singly occupied orbitals are excluded, and of a state with singly occupied orbitals only false|scriptB,ζ,γ,S,Mfalse⟩=|ζscriptU|γ,S,MscriptB.Here scriptB is the set of singly occupied orbitals, scriptU is the set of the remaining (doubly occupied and empty) orbitals, ζ distinguishes states that are different by pair scattering, and γ labels the different ways to couple the set scriptB of spin‐1/2 singly occupied levels to total spin S and spin projection M . An example of such a state with the total spin S=1 and spin projection M=1 is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%