2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscopic modelling of masonry using weak and strong discontinuities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the developed two-dimensional mesoscopic masonry model, the GFEM technique is used so that the behaviour of each brick is governed by a designated set of enhanced degrees of freedom [12]. Consequently, the displacement field can be decomposed according to…”
Section: Modelling Discontinuities Using Gfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the developed two-dimensional mesoscopic masonry model, the GFEM technique is used so that the behaviour of each brick is governed by a designated set of enhanced degrees of freedom [12]. Consequently, the displacement field can be decomposed according to…”
Section: Modelling Discontinuities Using Gfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the weak discontinuity model, Figure 1(a), a unit ramp function is used [7,11] whereas the Heaviside step function is used in the strong discontinuity model [2], Figure 1(b). Figure 1 also shows that for the same mesh size and when modelling stack bond masonry, i.e.…”
Section: Modelling Discontinuities Using Gfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this contribution we propose an compare two modelling approaches in both categories: (i) a discontinuous model based on the generalised finite element method (Vandoren et al 2013a) and (ii) a novel continuous finite element model based on the implicit gradient enhanced damage model. Both approaches require additional degrees of freedom which describe the jump fields of the discrete cracks and a regularising non-local strain field, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%