2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesothelin-related predictive and prognostic factors in malignant mesothelioma: A nested case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SMRP cut-off was 2.3 nmol/L. The authors observed neither elevated serum SMRP levels prior to the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma nor differences in SMRP concentration between the mesothelioma group and controls 36 . Conversely, this study showed significantly higher mesothelin levels in persons with pathological findings as compared with healthy individuals (0.78 ± 0.63 vs. 0.50 ± 0.35, P<0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The SMRP cut-off was 2.3 nmol/L. The authors observed neither elevated serum SMRP levels prior to the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma nor differences in SMRP concentration between the mesothelioma group and controls 36 . Conversely, this study showed significantly higher mesothelin levels in persons with pathological findings as compared with healthy individuals (0.78 ± 0.63 vs. 0.50 ± 0.35, P<0.0001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Given the small number of pleural mesothelioma cases, mesothelin levels could not be compared between pleural mesothelioma and other malignancies. Some studies claim that there is no increase in SMRP at 12 months or more before the diagnosis of mesothelioma 8,36 . On the other hand, it is suggested that at least six months prior to the development of clinical manifestations of mesothelioma, SMRP levels are significantly increased 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data from literature shows that in asbestos exposed subjects serum mesothelin is only marginally but not significantly increased over normal unexposed subjects [71] and there seems to be no increase over time [79]. Roe et al showed in a small series of 47 malignant mesothelioma for which they had available at least one serum sample, sampled between 6 months and 30 years before diagnosis that there is no significant elevation of serum mesothelin which could be useful for early mesothelioma diagnosis [80]. In this series neither CYFRA 21.1 nor CA 125 were more useful for mesothelioma early diagnosis.…”
Section: Mesothelinmentioning
confidence: 99%