2015
DOI: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesozoic-Cenozoic crustaceans preserved within echinoid tests and bivalve shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hermit crabs, which have taken up residency in gastropod and ammonite shells, represent a prime example of such behavior (e.g., Fraaije, 2003;Jagt et al, 2006). Many examples of specimens found in shells are known from the fossil record, including trilobites in Paleozoic brachiopods, hyoliths, nautiloids, and trilobites (Brett, 1977;Davis et al, 2001;Fatka et al, 2009;Fatka and Budil, 2014;Zong et al, 2016); echinoids, bivalves, heteromorph ammonites, and ophiuroids in Mesozoic ammonites (Ernst, 1967;Hagdorn, 1998;Matsumoto and Nihongi, 1979), decapods in Triassic-Miocene cephalopods, echinoids, and bivalves (Fraaije and Pennings, 2006;Fraaye and Jäger, 1995a;Gašparič et al, 2015;Klompmaker and Fraaije, 2012;Landman et al, 2014;Schulz, 2002) (Fig. 14); and fishes in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and inoceramid bivalves (Fraaye and Jäger, 1995b;Nyborg et al, 2014;Stewart, 1990;Vullo et al, 2009), among others.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hermit crabs, which have taken up residency in gastropod and ammonite shells, represent a prime example of such behavior (e.g., Fraaije, 2003;Jagt et al, 2006). Many examples of specimens found in shells are known from the fossil record, including trilobites in Paleozoic brachiopods, hyoliths, nautiloids, and trilobites (Brett, 1977;Davis et al, 2001;Fatka et al, 2009;Fatka and Budil, 2014;Zong et al, 2016); echinoids, bivalves, heteromorph ammonites, and ophiuroids in Mesozoic ammonites (Ernst, 1967;Hagdorn, 1998;Matsumoto and Nihongi, 1979), decapods in Triassic-Miocene cephalopods, echinoids, and bivalves (Fraaije and Pennings, 2006;Fraaye and Jäger, 1995a;Gašparič et al, 2015;Klompmaker and Fraaije, 2012;Landman et al, 2014;Schulz, 2002) (Fig. 14); and fishes in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and inoceramid bivalves (Fraaye and Jäger, 1995b;Nyborg et al, 2014;Stewart, 1990;Vullo et al, 2009), among others.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Triassic two out of twelve formally described species (and two not formally described species, including the herein described species) are phreatoicideans (16.7% phreatoicideans) (Picard 1858, Chilton 1918, Gall & Grauvogel 1971, Basso & Tintori 1994, Wilson & Edgecombe 2003, Fu et al 2010, Schöllmann et al 2015, Selden et al 2016). In the Jurassic there are at least 35 formally described species of Isopoda which are not representatives of Phreatoicidea (Meyer & Münster 1840;Milne Edwards 1843;Westwood 1854;Ammon 1882;Woodward 1890;Carter 1889;Stolley 1910;Remeš 1912;Van Straelen 1928;Reiff 1936;Frentzen 1937;Bachmayer 1955;Radawanski 1995;Grant-Mackie et al 1996;Polz 1998Polz , 2005aGuinot et al 2005;Polz et al 2006;Etter 2014;Jones et al 2014;Gašparič et al 2015;Keupp & Mahlow 2017). This is in contrast to one, not formally described, phreatoicidean from Antarctica (Borns et al 1972) (0.3% phreatoicideans).…”
Section: Decrease Of Phreatoicideansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fossil record for the Jurassic as well as for the Cretaceous and the Cenozoic is far more extensive. For the Jurassic there are more than 35 formally described species (Meyer & Münster 1840;Milne Edwards 1843;Westwood 1854;Ammon 1882;Carter 1889;Woodward 1890;Stolley 1910;Remeš 1912;Van Straelen 1928;Reiff 1936;Frentzen 1937;Bachmayer 1955;Radawanski 1995;Grant-Mackie et al 1996;Polz 1998Polz , 2005aGuinot et al 2005;Polz et al 2006;Etter 2014;Jones et al 2014;Gašparič et al 2015;Keupp & Mahlow 2017). Already in the Jurassic more ingroups of Isopoda become apparent such as some ingroups of Cymothoida (Etter 2014, Nagler et al 2017 or Sphaeromatidae (Bachmayer 1955, Radawanski 1995.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative is sediment trapping or washing in of the fish into the empty scallop shell. This is a feasible consideration because complete, delicate carapaces of crabs similar in size to A. townsendi have been described within articulated bivalves (Zullo and Chivers, 1969;Gašparič et al 2015). This type of taphonomic process would most likely require death of the fish in close proximity to the empty scallop shell followed by fairly rapid washing in of sediment with the fish into the valves of the scallop (i.e., sediment trapping).…”
Section: Taphonomic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%