2017
DOI: 10.4000/geomorphologie.11895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesurer et spatialiser la connectivité pour modéliser les changements des systèmes environnementaux. Approches comparées en écologie du paysage et en géomorphologie

Abstract: Mesurer et spatialiser la connectivité pour modéliser les changements des systèmes environnementaux. Approches comparées en écologie du paysage et en géomorphologie Measuring and spatializing connectivity within environmental systems networks to predict changes. Comparative approaches in landscape ecology and geomorphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The species-based approach used in the present study allows the development of an ecological network based on the identification of reference species (Bergès et al, 2010;Foltête et al, 2012;Bourgeois et al, 2017). Therefore, the mapping of this network is based on the characteristics of these selected species (habitat, dispersal, movement, reproduction, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The species-based approach used in the present study allows the development of an ecological network based on the identification of reference species (Bergès et al, 2010;Foltête et al, 2012;Bourgeois et al, 2017). Therefore, the mapping of this network is based on the characteristics of these selected species (habitat, dispersal, movement, reproduction, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach used to identify the reference species was based on the ecological requirements of these species and their movement capacities associated with the ecological quality of the environments (Bergès et al, 2010;Fu et al, 2010). The first objective is to identify the spatial relationships between the home ranges specific to a species (Foltête et al, 2012;Bourgeois et al, 2017). For this method, species data are used for their intrinsic conservation values and a distinction is made between emblematic, heritage, remarkable, and threatened species.…”
Section: Reference Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This empirical cost attribution method may be criticisable by specialists of each species, but it has the advantage of freeing us from collecting long and costly field data. For this reason, this cost attribution system is frequently used in landscape ecology studies (e.g., Verbeylen et al, 2003;Gurrutxaga et al, 2011;Clauzel et al, 2013;Bourgeois et al, 2018). The final cost assigned to each land-cover class for one species group is the average of the costs assigned for this land-cover class for all the species of this group.…”
Section: Attribution Of Movement Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%