2004
DOI: 10.3406/psy.2004.29664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesurer la résistance à l'interférence chez l'enfant : élaboration d'un nouveau test à « effet Stroop »

Abstract: Summary : Development of resistance to interference capacities Age-related changes in resistance to interference were examined on a new task, the « Stroop-drawing ». This task was constructed to be isomorphous to the original Stroop task (1935), but the resistance to interference was not based on subjects' reading capacities. Nine-year olds, 12-year olds and young adults were tested on the original Stroop task and on the « Stroop-drawing » task. The findings showed that performances on each task follow th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These abilities were assessed with a nonverbal Stroop task divided into three parts (Pennequin, Nanty, & Khomsi, 2004). In each one, participants had 60 seconds to process as many stimuli as possible.…”
Section: Running Head: How Does Episodic Memory Develop? 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abilities were assessed with a nonverbal Stroop task divided into three parts (Pennequin, Nanty, & Khomsi, 2004). In each one, participants had 60 seconds to process as many stimuli as possible.…”
Section: Running Head: How Does Episodic Memory Develop? 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were tested individually in a quiet room of their school or university for 35-40 min on average. They all completed the three following tasks in the same order: (1) a single temporal task, either reproduction or comparison task (single-task condition), (2) a single inhibitory control task (Stroop-like interference in animals size task, e.g., Catale & Meulemans, 2009;Naglieri & Das, 1997;Pennequin, Nanty, & Khomsi, 2004), and (3) the same temporal task concomitantly with the inhibitory control task (dual-task condition). Before each task, they were given one demonstration trial and three practice trials without feedback (as in test trials).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It covered intellectual ability (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, WISC-IV; Wechsler, 2005), attention, executive functions (Tower of London, Visual attention, Auditory attention, Response set, and Verbal fluency subtests of the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, NEPSY; Korkman, 2003; Stroop-Drawing; Pennequin et al, 2004), working memory (WISC-IV, Corsi blocks; Pagulayan et al, 2006), and episodic memory (Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test; Wilson et al, 2000). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%