2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MET Gene Amplification and Overexpression in Chinese Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Without EGFR Mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, Lutterbach et al first reported MET gene amplification and overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines 27 and their association with poor overall survival. 28 , 29 In our present study, we found the MET expression rate to be 36.8% by using immunohistochemistry, which was in agreement with previous reports. 29 , 30 We found a positive correlation between MET protein expression and primary tumor SUV max , which was significantly higher in patients with positive expression of MET than in those with negative expression of MET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2007, Lutterbach et al first reported MET gene amplification and overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines 27 and their association with poor overall survival. 28 , 29 In our present study, we found the MET expression rate to be 36.8% by using immunohistochemistry, which was in agreement with previous reports. 29 , 30 We found a positive correlation between MET protein expression and primary tumor SUV max , which was significantly higher in patients with positive expression of MET than in those with negative expression of MET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“… 28 , 29 In our present study, we found the MET expression rate to be 36.8% by using immunohistochemistry, which was in agreement with previous reports. 29 , 30 We found a positive correlation between MET protein expression and primary tumor SUV max , which was significantly higher in patients with positive expression of MET than in those with negative expression of MET. Tian et al also reported similar observation in human colorectal carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar discordance also has been observed in gastric-intestinal cancer studies by tissue microarray (unpublished data). In addition, the clinical impact of MET overexpression has been controversial, with some studies showing negative impact [ 33 ] and others showing the opposite results [ 32 ]. Our data did not show independent impact by MET overexpression alone assessed by IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CSE/B[α]P‐induced c‐MET activation was not observed in HCC827 or PC9 cells and did not cause EGFR TKI resistance. Consistent to our findings, c‐MET amplification was frequently detected in wtEGFR, but not in mutant EGFR‐expressing NSCLC patients, and is associated with a poor prognosis (Song et al ., ). Since HCC827 cells express EGFR activating mutant, which dominantly controls pro‐survival Akt signal, cigarette smoke may only switch the oncogene addition from the EGFR to MET pathway in wtEGFR‐expressing NSCLC cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%