2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(01)00453-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in oncology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mantel -Haenszel -Peto statistics was performed to test for heterogeneity between studies selected for the meta-analysis and to compute weighted odds ratio. 40,41 Results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Mantel -Haenszel -Peto statistics was performed to test for heterogeneity between studies selected for the meta-analysis and to compute weighted odds ratio. 40,41 Results…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Forest plots of the resection effect across the trials were drawn, and heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane's Q statistics [32]. In the absence of heterogeneity, pooled hazard ratios were estimated using the Maentel-Haenzel-Peto fixed effects method [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we worked out the value of observed minus estimated number of death (O-E) and its variance for each trial. OS curves were plotted [13] and the absolute differences between experimental arm and control arm in OS were calculated as well according to method by Pignon et al [14]. Results for LRR and DMR were expressed as relative risk (RR) ratio with 95% CIs using the Mantel-Haenszel method [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%