2023
DOI: 10.1111/apt.17385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta‐analysis: Enhanced liver fibrosis test to identify hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver diseases

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(238 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] Indeed, the initial cutoffs for ELF (< 7.7, 7.7-9.8, > 9.8) have been controversial. Despite inclusion in the AASLD guidelines, there is very limited data supporting the use of 7.7 cutoff; on the contrary, clinical evidence supports the use of 9.8 and 11.3 cutoffs, [5] as confirmed in the current study showing 0% of cases with ELF score <7.7. By using higher cutoffs (9.8 and 11.3), as shown in the third arm of the study, unnecessary referrals decrease by up to 20% without significantly increasing the false negative rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…[4] Indeed, the initial cutoffs for ELF (< 7.7, 7.7-9.8, > 9.8) have been controversial. Despite inclusion in the AASLD guidelines, there is very limited data supporting the use of 7.7 cutoff; on the contrary, clinical evidence supports the use of 9.8 and 11.3 cutoffs, [5] as confirmed in the current study showing 0% of cases with ELF score <7.7. By using higher cutoffs (9.8 and 11.3), as shown in the third arm of the study, unnecessary referrals decrease by up to 20% without significantly increasing the false negative rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…These AUC values are much higher than those for the FIB-4 (AUC 0.751) and APRI algorithms (AUC 0.737) for significant fibrosis [ 14 ] (see Additional File 1 ). The diagnostic accuracy of the ELF algorithm, which combines detection of hyaluronic acid, type III procollagen peptide (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP1), was evaluated in a recent meta-analysis of studies including nearly 20,000 individuals with or at risk of developing a wide variety of viral and non-viral liver diseases [ 35 ]. The analysis reported an AUC of 0.811 for detecting fibrosis, 0.812 for advanced fibrosis, and 0.810 for advanced cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced liver fibrosis score and FibroTest are patented blood-based biomarkers with higher specificity (80%–90%), but with higher cost and limited availability, especially in resource-constrained settings (120). It should be acknowledged that enhanced liver fibrosis is not as well validated in patients with ALD as other etiologies such as HCV and MASLD (124). Furthermore, platelets can be reduced by active alcohol use, which can affect the accuracy of FIB-4 as a noninvasive serological marker for fibrosis assessment in patients with ALD (1).…”
Section: Ald Disease Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%