2016
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis

Abstract: BackgroundFor more than a century, appendicectomy has been the treatment of choice for appendicitis. Recent trials have challenged this view. This study assessed the benefits and harms of antibiotic therapy compared with appendicectomy in patients with non‐perforated appendicitis.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted for randomized trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in patients with non‐perforated appendicitis. Key outcomes were analysed using random‐effects meta‐analysis, and the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
180
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
180
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[43][44][45][46] If primary antibiotic treatment is initiated, a fifth of patients can expect a readmission, with recurrent symptoms within a year; most will undergo an appendicectomy that is not more complicated. The data for use of antibiotics have short follow-up times, so the lifetime recurrence risk and the risk of missing a subclinical incidental neoplasm are unknown.…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46] If primary antibiotic treatment is initiated, a fifth of patients can expect a readmission, with recurrent symptoms within a year; most will undergo an appendicectomy that is not more complicated. The data for use of antibiotics have short follow-up times, so the lifetime recurrence risk and the risk of missing a subclinical incidental neoplasm are unknown.…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports described spontaneous resolution of uncomplicated appendicitis without the need of an operation and, since the high rate of negative appendectomy and the significative complications rate, some authors proposed and advised conservative management for uncomplicated appendicitis[6,7]. Conservative management for appendicitis has been described in 1930 by the “Ochsen-Sherren delayed[8] treatment”, which consisted of resting and fasting followed by delayed elective appendectomy; nowadays, a conservative approach based on antibiotic therapy is gaining popularity, as documented by several randomized studies and meta-analyses that analyze this peculiar issue[9-17]. Conservative treatment has been shown to be safe and effective as primary treatment compared to surgical treatment with a significative reduction in morbidity, even with a considerable one year recurrence rate of 23%[17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservative management for appendicitis has been described in 1930 by the “Ochsen-Sherren delayed[8] treatment”, which consisted of resting and fasting followed by delayed elective appendectomy; nowadays, a conservative approach based on antibiotic therapy is gaining popularity, as documented by several randomized studies and meta-analyses that analyze this peculiar issue[9-17]. Conservative treatment has been shown to be safe and effective as primary treatment compared to surgical treatment with a significative reduction in morbidity, even with a considerable one year recurrence rate of 23%[17]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard treatment for acute appendicitis in the past century has been surgical removal of the appendix, but there is still some debate whether open appendectomy (OA) or laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the preferable surgical approach. More recently, some data suggest that medical treatment can suffice in uncomplicated cases [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%