2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of Ecopath models reveals secondary productivity patterns across the Gulf of Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the sensitivity analysis, another important forage fish was found to have a large capacity to increase biomass in this estuarine food web: the detritivorous Atlantic Menhaden, which is highly migratory and commercially valuable (McBride 2014). The detritus pool positively impacted the Atlantic Menhaden group and several other groups, corresponding with previous documentation that detritus-derived carbon powers benthic food webs exerting bottom-up control in estuaries (Baird and Ulanowicz 1989;Blomberg and Montagna 2014;Buchheister and Latour 2015). These findings highlight the value of preserving marsh habitat-which contributes significant detrital biomass to the SRE-to maintain total system function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on the sensitivity analysis, another important forage fish was found to have a large capacity to increase biomass in this estuarine food web: the detritivorous Atlantic Menhaden, which is highly migratory and commercially valuable (McBride 2014). The detritus pool positively impacted the Atlantic Menhaden group and several other groups, corresponding with previous documentation that detritus-derived carbon powers benthic food webs exerting bottom-up control in estuaries (Baird and Ulanowicz 1989;Blomberg and Montagna 2014;Buchheister and Latour 2015). These findings highlight the value of preserving marsh habitat-which contributes significant detrital biomass to the SRE-to maintain total system function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The Lindeman spine (Lindeman 1942), showed that the greatest amount of transferred energy was provided by primary producers structured mainly by algae and seagrasses, which are present with considerable abundance in the study area (Felder and Camp 2009;Blomberg and Montagna 2014). This trophic group also contributes to the greatest amount of energy for Detritus.…”
Section: Whole System Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Crustacea was identified as the most important trophic group in the system, unfortunately it could not be divided into individual groups to analyze it in greater detail, this is due to the fact that it is made of different species of brachyurans with variable biomasses. However, in general, the main function of this group within the ecosystem is to provide energy and biomass to the multiple trophic groups, such as most fish (Hajisamae et al 2004;Blomberg and Montagna, 2014), limiting with low predation other groups such as Mollusk, Polychaeta, and other Benthic invertebrates. Therefore, a variation in its biomass implies a change in the ecosystem, this has already been observed in the study by Zetina-Rejon et al (2015).…”
Section: Whole System Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current strategies for monitoring ecosystem-level processes include scaling studies that rely on limited field data and mapped areas to interpolate metabolic rates from reef system to global scales. In the Gulf of Mexico, benthic autotrophs are estimated to contribute up to 90% of primary production within coral reef systems (Blomberg & Montagna, 2014). Therefore, mapping the relative functional-groups that contribute to production is important in assessing productivity of coastal systems.…”
Section: Current Scaling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%