2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the temporoparietal junction is considered a node of the salience network given consistent evidence that it responds to a range of novel stimuli (ie, auditory, visual, tactile), 5 covaries in resting activity with other salience network structures, 66 and includes subregions that encode a variety of PEs, particularly unsigned PEs. 14 , 53 The normative response of the temporoparietal junction to PE in this study was deactivation (as opposed to activation), consistent with findings from prior studies suggesting that greater suppression of this area in response to increasing attentional demands (cognitive load and surprise) supports filtering of cognitive and perceptual information in healthy individuals. 67 Thus, our observation of aberrant PE-evoked activation of the temporoparietal junction in CHR youth may reflect impaired filtering of internal or external information, consistent with the hypothesis that enhance salience signaling may be involved in the initial formation of psychotic symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, the temporoparietal junction is considered a node of the salience network given consistent evidence that it responds to a range of novel stimuli (ie, auditory, visual, tactile), 5 covaries in resting activity with other salience network structures, 66 and includes subregions that encode a variety of PEs, particularly unsigned PEs. 14 , 53 The normative response of the temporoparietal junction to PE in this study was deactivation (as opposed to activation), consistent with findings from prior studies suggesting that greater suppression of this area in response to increasing attentional demands (cognitive load and surprise) supports filtering of cognitive and perceptual information in healthy individuals. 67 Thus, our observation of aberrant PE-evoked activation of the temporoparietal junction in CHR youth may reflect impaired filtering of internal or external information, consistent with the hypothesis that enhance salience signaling may be involved in the initial formation of psychotic symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We focused our analyses on the amygdala and AI, given evidence of their involvement in salience signaling, stress response, and psychotic and affective psychopathology, but supplemented with whole-brain analyses given the known relevance of additional regions such as the temporoparietal junction and other insular subfields. 4 , 5 , 14 , 53 In addition, we paid special attention to effects of violent trauma exposures on salience signaling, given that such exposures are likely to have especially pathogenic effects on the development of this brain network. 52 , 54 , 55 We operationalized unvalenced surprising outcomes in two complementary ways: parametrically, quantified as the magnitude of the unsigned PE, or degree of mismatch between expectation and outcome irrespective of its direction; and nonparametrically, as the binary presence (vs absence) of a mismatch between the expected and unexpected outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efference copies may include inferences of another's mental states arising from theory of mind regions or semantic information from language-relevant regions (Figure 1A). Supporting this, several neuroimaging studies find that the posterolateral cerebellum, particularly lobules VI-VIII, represents sociolinguistic predictions and prediction errors (Moberget and Ivry, 2016;Ernst et al, 2019;Van Overwalle et al, 2019;Corlett et al, 2022). Neuromodulation of these regions perturbs predictive language behaviors and social sequencing (Lesage et al, 2012(Lesage et al, , 2017D'Mello et al, 2017;Van Overwalle et al, 2020).…”
Section: Adaptive Prediction In the Cerebellum: From Neurons To Networkmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, climbing fibers from the inferior olive provide prediction error signals to Purkinje cells, which distinguish which granule cell inputs are most informative. These prediction errors can be signed or unsigned, signaling exactly how cerebellar Purkinje cells should respond to alter behavior (see Corlett et al, 2022 for evidence of prediction error in human cerebellum). Inputs from climbing fibers can cause long-term depression (LTD) at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses-potentially serving to inhibit actions Buckner et al, 2011;Yeo et al, 2011; other networks visualized include dorsal (green) and ventral attention (violet), somatomotor (blue), visual (purple), and limbic (cream)).…”
Section: Adaptive Prediction In the Cerebellum: From Neurons To Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, anatomical deviations which are "categorical" errors and uncommon in real life, may be computed in more frontal regions relating to high level prediction errors (Alexander & Brown, 2018;Corlett et al, 2022).…”
Section: Divergent Neural Processing For Temporal and Anatomical Conf...mentioning
confidence: 99%