Meta-Analysis of Staged Versus Combined Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Twenty-Four Hour Staged Carotid Endarterectomy Followed by Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Grafting for Patients With Concomitant Carotid and Coronary Disease

“…One study compared early and late outcomes with 3 approaches (synchronous CEA and open heart surgery, staged CEA and open heart surgery and staged carotid artery stenting and open heart surgery), including interstage events as a risk factor for outcomes after open heart surgery [16]. A recently published metaanalysis suggests comparable outcomes in synchronous and staged methods; however, to date there are no published results of a staged approach specifically with 24-hour staging [17]. We hypothesized that staging high-risk patients to receive CABG within 24 hours after CEA will decrease the risk of MI by revascularizing patients before the postoperative days when they are at greatest risk for acute coronary events [11].…”

The effect of degree of stenosis and surgical timing on stroke and mortality in patients with carotid artery stenosis who are undergoing coronary bypass grafting: Retrospective study

“…Birçok cerrah, ameliyat sırası ME endişesi ile öncelikli KEA yapmaya isteksiz yaklaşmaktadır. [3,11] Öncelikli KABG yapılmasının da inme oranını artırdığı bildirilmiştir. [3] 1989 yılında eş zamanlı ameliyatlarla ilgili ilk bildirilerde inme ve ölüm riski %2 olarak kaydedilmiştir.…”

Surgical treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and bilateral carotid lesion

“…В недавнем метаанализе этапных вмешательств в сравнении с одно-моментными КЭ и АКШ, представленном V. Sharma и со-авт. [15] p=0,2), между двумя хирургическими методиками. В на-стоящее время появились сведения о преимуществах и хороших результатах гибридных вмешательств на коро-нарном и каротидном бассейнах [3,8].…”