2019
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer

Abstract: Background The current standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant long‐course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Surgery is conventionally performed approximately 6–8 weeks after nCRT. This study aimed to determine the effect on outcomes of extending this interval. Methods A systematic search was performed for studies reporting oncological results that compared the classical interval (less than 8 weeks) from the end of nCRT to TME with a minimum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the interval between nCRT and TME to a minimum of 8 weeks appears to increase pCR and downstaging rates, and improve disease‐free survival. It is unclear whether an increased interval leads to more tissue reaction and consequently complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the interval between nCRT and TME to a minimum of 8 weeks appears to increase pCR and downstaging rates, and improve disease‐free survival. It is unclear whether an increased interval leads to more tissue reaction and consequently complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to thank Hajibandeh and Hajibandeh for their close reading of our recent publication and commend them for drawing attention to the particularly important topic of the handling of survival outcome data in meta‐analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest the meta‐analysis by Ryan et al . which evaluated comparative outcomes for an interval of less than 8 weeks from the end of neoadjuvant long‐course chemoradiotherapy to total mesorectal excision and an interval of more than 8 weeks in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being a comprehensive meta‐analysis with robust methodological quality, there is an error in the analysis of recurrence‐free survival (RFS) which has led Ryan et al . to interpret the results incorrectly, and to make incorrect subsequent conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%