2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Automated Contrast Injection Devices Versus Manual Injection and Contrast Volume on Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Abstract: Contrast sparing devices have been slowly adopted into routine patient care. Randomized trial evidence of automated contrast injectors (ACIs) has not been analyzed to evaluate the true reduction in contrast volume during coronary angiography and intervention. It is thought that by reducing the amount of contrast exposure there will be a simultaneous reduction in the risk of CIN. Therefore, we sought to synthesize published evidence on contrast sparing devices, contrast volume and incidence of contrast-induced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 According to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, this treatment is rated as a class IIb recommendation for patients at a high risk of CIN. 27 that included studies comparing the amount of CM volume delivery between automated contrast injectors and manual manifold injection demonstrated a decrease of contrast volume delivery by 45 mL/case and significant reduction in CIN incidence.…”
Section: Furosemide With Matched Hydrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 According to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines, this treatment is rated as a class IIb recommendation for patients at a high risk of CIN. 27 that included studies comparing the amount of CM volume delivery between automated contrast injectors and manual manifold injection demonstrated a decrease of contrast volume delivery by 45 mL/case and significant reduction in CIN incidence.…”
Section: Furosemide With Matched Hydrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(58) A most recent meta-analysis has also proven that reduction of CM volume with the use of automated contrast injector significantly reduces the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography. (59) However, according to ACR manuals, there is a lack of robust data to support a dose-toxicity relationship for intravenous iodinated CM, as only intracardiac iodinated CM shows a directly proportional relationship. (19) MR imaging is an alternative imaging modality when CT cannot be performed.…”
Section: During the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CM volume is a key risk factor for CI-AKI and matters the most in high-risk patients [21]. Use of automated contrast injectors can help achieve this as it reduces the CM volume used [22]. …”
Section: Effect Of Route Of CM On Ci-akimentioning
confidence: 99%