2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731110002314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the impact of stocking rate on the productivity of pasture-based milk production systems

Abstract: The objective of this study is to quantify the milk production response per cow and per hectare (ha) for an incremental stocking rate (SR) change, based on a meta-analysis of published research papers. Suitable experiments for inclusion in the database required a comparison of at least two SRs under the same experimental conditions in addition to details on experimental length and milk production results per cow and per ha. Each additional increased SR treatment was also described in terms of the relative milk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
67
3
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
67
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal production attributes such as milk production, body condition score and body weight are negatively Figure 1 Seasonal changes in daily (mean ± s.e) CH 4 concentration from the cows in different parities correlated with the increase in stocking rate (McCarthy et al 2014). Research indicated that an increase in stocking rate results in increased grazing intensity, which will subsequently result in lower daily herbage allowance (McCarthy et al 2011). Changes in seasons from wet to dry meant that available forage material is fibrous and is not palatable, hence lowering DMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal production attributes such as milk production, body condition score and body weight are negatively Figure 1 Seasonal changes in daily (mean ± s.e) CH 4 concentration from the cows in different parities correlated with the increase in stocking rate (McCarthy et al 2014). Research indicated that an increase in stocking rate results in increased grazing intensity, which will subsequently result in lower daily herbage allowance (McCarthy et al 2011). Changes in seasons from wet to dry meant that available forage material is fibrous and is not palatable, hence lowering DMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although milk production/cow is low, milk production/hectare can be high (Macdonald et al, 2008;McCarthy et al, 2011). Nonetheless, the low milk production per cow is often seen as a limitation that can be improved upon through improved genetics (Ramsbottom et al, 2012), reduced stocking rate (Macdonald et al, 2008;McCarthy et al, 2011), or the provision of additional feed as a supplement to pasture (Kennedy et al, 2002;Horan et al, 2004;Roche et al, 2006). There are well-defined response curves to these management changes and, in theory, it is possible to increase milk production/cow through changes in these variables and improve productivity and profitability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to both Valentine et al (2009) andFariña et al (2011), SR had no significant effect on net herbage accumulation but, as a consequence of the increased efficiency of herbage removal and increased grazing severity at higher SR, resulted in increased grazed grass utilization. Both Baudracco et al (2010) and McCarthy et al (2011) have previously likened an increase in SR to a reduction in daily herbage allowance. In the current study, increasing SR resulted in reduced daily herbage allowance, reduced total lactation milk production per cow, and increased milk production per hectare, which is consistent with previous experiments at similar SR (Macdonald et al, 2008;Fariña et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By virtue of lower production costs, milk production from grass-based systems in Ireland and northwest Europe are anticipated to expand based on the production and utilization of increased quantities of high-quality grass (Lips and Reider, 2005;O'Donnell et al, 2008;DAFM, 2011). Stocking rate (SR; cows/ha), defined as the number of animals per unit area of land used during a specified period of time, is well accepted as the main driver of productivity within grazing systems (Hoden et al, 1991;Macdonald et al, 2008;McCarthy et al, 2011), and recent studies have highlighted the beneficial effects of a high SR on animal productivity, grazed grass utilization, and overall farm system efficiency (Kelly et al, 2012;McCarthy et al, 2013a). Notwithstanding these beneficial effects, previous studies have also indicated that where increased SR are associated with increased chemical fertilizer N application and off-farm supplementary feed importation, N surpluses increase and N utilization is reduced, resulting in increased N loss to ground water and the general environment (Di and Cameron, 2002a;Treacy et al, 2008;Ryan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%