2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the Impact of Avoiding Balloon Predilation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This meta‐analysis also differs from another previous meta‐analysis of observational studies, which showed that direct TAVR was associated with less AR, fewer pacemaker implantation, vascular complications 20 . The present meta‐analysis showed that moderate‐severe AR/PVL, new pacemaker implantation, and vascular complications were similar in both groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This meta‐analysis also differs from another previous meta‐analysis of observational studies, which showed that direct TAVR was associated with less AR, fewer pacemaker implantation, vascular complications 20 . The present meta‐analysis showed that moderate‐severe AR/PVL, new pacemaker implantation, and vascular complications were similar in both groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, none of the 158 patients with both a balloon-expandable valve and without predilation developed LCP. A recent meta-analysis of the impact of balloon predilation found lower PPI rates in patients without predilation 15. This supports the theory that predilation could result in direct trauma and ischaemia to the conduction system causing early CDs 16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, these studies have been mostly limited to the previous generation of SAPIEN XT prosthesis [4]; although, some have been conducted for the currently commercially available SAPIEN 3 prosthesis [9,15]. Larger studies, [6,7,9]. We should, however, acknowledge that there was a trend toward a worse composite safety endpoint in the direct TAVR group, although it was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Impact Of Direct Tavr Vs Pre-bav Tavr On Procedures and 30day Safety Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%