Meta-Analysis on the Improvement of Symptoms and Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors Based on Medical Care and Exercise Intervention

Abstract

Gastric cancer is a malignant tumor that originates from the epithelium of the gastric mucosa. It is the result of a combination of multiple factors, but the current research has not yet clarified its pathogenesis, so further research and exploration are needed. This article is mainly based on the meta-analysis of the improvement of gastrointestinal tumor-related symptoms and prognosis based on medical care and exercise intervention. The control group followed routine care after enrollment. In addition to routine care, patients in the intervention group exercised through assessment, formulation of exercise prescriptions, implementation of supervision, and adjustment. By viewing the subjects' physical examination reports, determine their blood routine, urine routine, blood lipids, blood sugar, liver and kidney function, and electrocardiogram examination. In this experiment, dual-contrast ultrasound in each T staging was greater than 0.8, indicating that the diagnostic method is very accurate in the preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer T staging. The results show that exercise intervention can improve the pain of patients with gastrointestinal tumors after chemotherapy, relieve cancer-induced fatigue, and improve the quality of life.

Current Applications of Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease—From Early Cancer Detection to Individualized Cancer Treatment

“…Although the prognosis of many GI cancers has improved over the past decades [ 2 , 3 ], a late cancer diagnosis is still the leading reason for cancer-related deaths among all GI cancers [ 4 ]. Current research focuses therefore on improving early cancer diagnosis, possibly leading to better outcomes among all GI cancers [ 5 , 6 ].…”

Retracted: Meta‐Analysis on the Improvement of Symptoms and Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Tumors Based on Medical Care and Exercise Intervention

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”