Meta-Analysis Reveals a Bilingual Advantage That Is Dependent on Task and Age

Abstract

Debate continues on whether a bilingual advantage exists with respect to executive functioning. This report synthesized the results of 170 studies to test whether the bilingual advantage is dependent on the task used to assess executive functioning and the age of the participants. The results of the meta-analyses indicated that the bilingual advantage was both task-and age-specific. Bilinguals were significantly faster than monolinguals (Hedges' g values ranged from 0.23 to 0.34), and significantly more accurate than monolinguals (Hedges' g values ranged between 0.18 and 0.49) on four out of seven tasks. Also, an effect of age was found whereby the bilingual advantage was larger for studies comprising samples aged 50-years and over (Hedges' g = 0.49), compared to those undertaken with participants aged between 18 and 29 years (Hedges' g = 0.12). The extent to which the bilingual advantage might be due to publication bias was assessed using multiple methods. These were Egger's Test of Asymmetry, Duval and Tweedie's Trim and Fill, Classic Fail-Safe N, and PET-PEESE. Publication bias was only found when using Egger's Test of Asymmetry and PET-PEESE method, but not when using the other methods. This review indicates that if bilingualism does enhance executive functioning, the effects are modulated by task and age. This may arise because using multiple languages has a highly specific effect on executive functioning which is only observable in older, relative to younger, adults. The finding that publication bias was not uniformly detected across the different methods raises questions about the impact that unpublished (or undetected) studies have on meta-analyses of this literature.

The Relationship between Overweight/Obesity and Executive Control in College Students: The Mediating Effect of BDNF and 5-HT

“…Executive control plays a pivotal role in executive functions [ 11 ]. There are many neuropsychological paradigms can measure the performance of executive control including the Flanker task, Stroop task, and Go/No go task [ 12 ]. A previous study reported that poor development of EC leads to abnormal cognitive, emotional, and social functions in individuals, thereby adversely affecting their social achievements in adulthood [ 13 ].…”

Exploration of Attentional and Executive Abilities in French-Speaking Children Immersed in Dutch Since 1, 2, 3, and 6 Years

“…Secondly, the tasks used to evaluate attentional and executive functions (AEF) could also influence the outcomes. A recent meta-analysis (Ware et al, 2020) showed that the type of task used to assess executive functioning influenced the magnitude of the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals. For example, bilingual advantage is consistently observed on the Attentional Network Task but not on the Flanker Task despite the fact that these two commonly used tasks are highly similar and are supposed to evaluate the same AEF processes.…”

Neural differences in the temporal cascade of reactive and proactive control for bilinguals and monolinguals

“…Finally, it remains plausible that our study only had sufficient power to detect ERP effects which are likely robustly larger than behavioral effects. A meta‐analysis conducted by Ware and colleagues (2020) reported small to medium effect size parameter estimates for behavioral measures; whereas, an ERP Stroop task study (Kousaie & Phillips, 2012) reported medium to large main and task by group interaction effects for ERP components (i.e., P2, N2, & ERN).…”