2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3fo00845b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis reveals gut microbiome and functional pathway alterations in response to resistant starch

Abstract: Resistant starch (RS) has the ability to improve the structure of gut microbiota, regulate glucolipid metabolism and maintain the health of the human body, and has been extensively studied by...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this, we speculate that the EVs isolated from plasma in our study may partly have come from intestinal bacteria. Among them, Bacteroidetes had a higher abundance ratio in the EBF group, while Firmicutes butyrate-producing Agatobacterium and Eubacterium rectal-derived EVs had a higher abundance ratio in the EBF group, which is consistent with previous reports of different gut microbiome profiles [ 43 , 44 ]. In their study, Heo et al [ 41 ] found that the microbiota that caused significant differences between the IBD group and the control group differed in the fecal microbiome and gut microbe-derived EVs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Based on this, we speculate that the EVs isolated from plasma in our study may partly have come from intestinal bacteria. Among them, Bacteroidetes had a higher abundance ratio in the EBF group, while Firmicutes butyrate-producing Agatobacterium and Eubacterium rectal-derived EVs had a higher abundance ratio in the EBF group, which is consistent with previous reports of different gut microbiome profiles [ 43 , 44 ]. In their study, Heo et al [ 41 ] found that the microbiota that caused significant differences between the IBD group and the control group differed in the fecal microbiome and gut microbe-derived EVs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, the Shannon index was significantly decreased after daily RS intake, while the Chao1 index showed no obvious change. We speculated the possible reason was that RS fermented in the colon to produce plenty of SCFAs, thus lowering the pH value in the intestinal lumen that provides more favorable conditions for the growth of beneficial bacteria and suppresses the growth of some gram-negative bacteria and pathogenic bacteria in the gut [22], leading to an unchanged Chao1 index. At the same time, some bacteria are less able to utilize RS and relatively reduced after RS intake; therefore, this relatively specialized nature of the community responding to RS may decrease the Shannon index [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have performed meta-analyses to explore the effects of RS supplementation on glycemic control [18], bowel function [19], inflammatory biomarkers [20], and serum cholesterol levels [21]. Recently, Chen et al revealed that a lower gut microbial α-diversity and higher relative abundance of Ruminococcus, Agathobacter, Faecalibacterium, and Bifidobacterium were observed at the endpoint after RS intake in comparison to the baseline [22]. However, the different effects of placebo and RS on human gut microbiota have not been systematically reviewed through meta-analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS appeared to impact mechanisms related to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Notably, different RS types were found to alter differently microbiome responses ( 57 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%