2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2840327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Classifiers in Huntington’s Disease Patients Classification, Using iPhone’s Movement Sensors Placed at the Ankles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies used wearable sensors to monitor sleep-wake activity (time spent asleep and motor activity during sleep) [ 45 ], as well as sleep measurements (total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and wake after sleep onset) [ 39 ], or circadian rhythm [ 40 , 41 ]. Several studies have investigated balance [ 38 ] and walking/gait characteristics [ 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 48 , 52 ]. Kegelmeyer et al made a quantitative biomechanical assessment of trunk control, measuring the trunk stability during standing, sitting and walking, and the ability of individuals to modify trunk position responding to some auditory cues [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies used wearable sensors to monitor sleep-wake activity (time spent asleep and motor activity during sleep) [ 45 ], as well as sleep measurements (total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and wake after sleep onset) [ 39 ], or circadian rhythm [ 40 , 41 ]. Several studies have investigated balance [ 38 ] and walking/gait characteristics [ 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 48 , 52 ]. Kegelmeyer et al made a quantitative biomechanical assessment of trunk control, measuring the trunk stability during standing, sitting and walking, and the ability of individuals to modify trunk position responding to some auditory cues [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting meaningful and useful outcomes from high-dimension datasets is a major challenge as digital biomarker technology becomes ever more complex. That was the reason why some of the studies focused on advanced machine learning approaches and new algorithms or analysis methods to extract parameters with the best discrimination ability and increase the classification accuracy between HD and controls [25,32,37,44,51,52]. However, none of the proposed algorithms has been reproduced in a replication cohort.…”
Section: Performance Of Wearable Devices In Hd: What Did They Add To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is based on a supervised and trained two-state hidden Markov model, which can be extended to different research subjects for clinical practice and personal health assessment. At the same time, Francisco et al collected the gait data of HD patients by binding the iPhone on the ankles of patients, using the built-in smart sensor of iPhone, and classified the data with the general assembly (meta) classifier algorithm to distinguish normal people and HD patients [14]. The use of wearable devices to monitor the movements and gaits of HD patients requires the binding of electronic devices to a part of the patient's body, which will affect the patient's movements to a certain extent and cannot collect movement data in the natural state of the patient.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait features based on spatio-temporal parameters of frequency domain used in this work, were introduced in an exploratory study to analyze gait patterns of subjects with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), using data from a DynaPort MiniMod triaxial accelerometer [33]. These gait features were used in a previous study to improve the results in the classification of people with Huntington's disease, in which the results obtained with these characteristics were also validated against those obtained from a stratified sensors dataset [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPhone smartphone sensors have been shown to be accurate and reliable enough to evaluate and identify kinematic gait patterns [21,22], the iPhone's ability to capture gait characteristics with a sufficient level of consistency in ankle position has been shown in studies related to gait assessment and health care, as well as its comfort, portability and wearability [23][24][25]. In previous works, gait data collected with movement sensors from patients with Huntington's disease and healthy elderly people were compared and validated by implementing automatic learning techniques with several meta-classification algorithms [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%