DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85853-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta Comments for Summarizing Meeting Speech

Abstract: Abstract. This paper is about the extractive summarization of meeting speech, using the ICSI and AMI corpora. In the first set of experiments we use prosodic, lexical, structural and speaker-related features to select the most informative dialogue acts from each meeting, with the hypothesis being that such a rich mixture of features will yield the best results. In the second part, we present an approach in which the identification of "meta-comments" is used to create more informative summaries that provide an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the ConverSumm system with state-of-the-art systems for meeting and email summarization, respectively, we also present results using the features described by Murray and Renals (2008) for meetings and the features described by Rambow (2004) for email. Because the work by Murray and Renals used the same dataset, we can compare our scores directly.…”
Section: Comparison Summarization Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the ConverSumm system with state-of-the-art systems for meeting and email summarization, respectively, we also present results using the features described by Murray and Renals (2008) for meetings and the features described by Rambow (2004) for email. Because the work by Murray and Renals used the same dataset, we can compare our scores directly.…”
Section: Comparison Summarization Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of several feature groups has been suggested to enhance automatic meeting summarisation methods and this really seems to improve the outcome in general [43,62]. Thus, this work assumes that additional clues may be helpful for meeting summarisation techniques.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%