2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-model-assisted MGDA for multi-objective functional optimization

Abstract: International audienceA novel numerical method for multi-objective differentiable optimization, the Multiple-Gradient Descent Algorithmm (MGDA), has been proposed in [8] [11] to identify Pareto fronts. In MGDA, a direction of search for which the directional gradients of the objective functions are all negative, and often equal by construction [12], is identified and used in a steepest-descent-type iteration. The method converges to Pareto-optimal points. MGDA is here briefly reviewed to outline its principal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in combination with expensive numerical simulations such approaches tend to be inefficient. On the other hand, gradientbased algorithms [17,24,53] require efficient gradient computations and are often applied in the context of adjoint approaches and using weighted sum scalarizations of the objective functions. See [41] for a comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in combination with expensive numerical simulations such approaches tend to be inefficient. On the other hand, gradientbased algorithms [17,24,53] require efficient gradient computations and are often applied in the context of adjoint approaches and using weighted sum scalarizations of the objective functions. See [41] for a comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, recently, Data-Driven Models (DDMs) are attracting the attention of the industry and academia for their ability to accurately surrogate complex experimental (e.g., EFD) [26]- [29] or numerical (e.g., CFD) [1], [14], [16], [17], [19], [21], [22] procedures based on a historical collection of their inputs and outputs, with a function that is computationally expensive to construct but computationally inexpensive to use. Consequently, DDMs can be included directly both in a human-driven optimization loop reducing the computational requirements (i.e., time) between design iterations or developing a fully automated optimization loop requiring minimal human intervention, enabling the exploration of a wider design space [2], [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%