2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta Programming with Answer Sets for Smart Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that SPARQL is not the only way to define such rules. Another promising approach is answer set programming [25], when SIB is enhanced with artificial reasoners for the content.…”
Section: Session Management Contains Operations Join and Leavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that SPARQL is not the only way to define such rules. Another promising approach is answer set programming [25], when SIB is enhanced with artificial reasoners for the content.…”
Section: Session Management Contains Operations Join and Leavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gebser et al [19] present a meta-approach to declaratively debug ASP programs. In [22], a meta-level ASP representation is used to manage interacting embedded computational objects that publish their properties as ASP programs.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from a practical point of view, we prefer the second solution, where only relevant nodes in the parse tree are taken into account. Conceptually, the latter solution is similar to the approach taken in many applications of metareasoning in the context of ASP [18,19,22]. The biggest difference is that in ASP, one typically enforces restrictions on programs to handle infinite domains: programs are assumed to be safe, i.e., written by a careful programmer to ensure that the grounding is finite, while we allow any FO(•) IDP theory.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%