2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic and process engineering for biodesulfurization in Gram-negative bacteria

Abstract: Microbial desulfurization or biodesulfurization (BDS) is an attractive low-cost and environmentally friendly complementary technology to the hydrotreating chemical process based on the potential of certain bacteria to specifically remove sulfur from S-heterocyclic compounds of crude fuels that are recalcitrant to the chemical treatments. The 4S or Dsz sulfur specific pathway for dibenzothiophene (DBT) and alkyl-substituted DBTs, widely used as model S-heterocyclic compounds, has been extensively studied at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same conditions, BDS yield of recombinant strain increased from 16.0% ± 0.9 to 34.0% ± 1.9 (DBT dissolved in ethanol). This observation indicates that the tolerance of the modified strain to high DBT concentrations is more than that of wild type as previously reported in the literature ( Martinez et al, 2017 ). This is also a great advantage of the new construct as in real hydrocarbon media at large-scale, concentrations of organosulfur compounds such as DBT are much higher than those examined in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same conditions, BDS yield of recombinant strain increased from 16.0% ± 0.9 to 34.0% ± 1.9 (DBT dissolved in ethanol). This observation indicates that the tolerance of the modified strain to high DBT concentrations is more than that of wild type as previously reported in the literature ( Martinez et al, 2017 ). This is also a great advantage of the new construct as in real hydrocarbon media at large-scale, concentrations of organosulfur compounds such as DBT are much higher than those examined in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless, fast growth rate of E. coli compared to other strains, low-cost medium and nutrient, well-known genetic trait and extensive research work performed on this strain has made E. coli an appealing tool for genetic engineering studies including dsz genes insertion. Martinez et al (2017) discussed that several gram negative bacteria have been used in BDS because of some metabolic and genetic properties such as metabolic versatility and easy genetic manipulation; but, they did not address mass transfer limitation in gram negative systems that preferably uptake sulfur source from aqueous phase rather than organic phase. Practically, mass transfer limitation is the main cause of low BDS yield since majority of DBT is dissolved in organic phase and only insignificant amount of DBT remains in aqueous phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to biological factors, it should be noted that in this mixed biofilm respective metabolism of DBT and QN in R. rhodochrous and mutants are carry on by different pathways were occurrence of metabolic intermediates and culture media could affect the biocatalyst efficiency. DBT in R. rhodochrous is used as the sulfur source (but not as the carbon source) by the non-destructive “4S pathway” that selectively removes the sulfur generating 2-hydroxybiphenyl as toxic end product affecting bacteria with lower growth rate [ 29 , 30 ]. Nevertheless, according to genomic and microbiological evidence Cobetia sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, HDS is costly since it requires industrial units operating at high temperatures (>300 °C), pressure (3-10 MPa), and volume of hydrogen gas, with expensive catalysts and low energy efficiency (Kaisy, et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2016;Zaid et al, 2017). Many of these limitations could be solved by developing desulfurization methods involving adsorption (Shah et al, 2016;Mirshra et al, 2017), oxidative desulphurization (Rezvani et al, 2017;Hitam et al, 2018), bio-desulfurization (Martínez et al, 2017;Paixão et al, 2016), microwave assisted desulphurization, ultrasound (Taheri-Shakib et al, 2017;Mozafari and Nasri, 2017), and extractive desulphurization (Safa et al, 2016;Elwan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%