2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2020.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic flux analysis reaching genome wide coverage: lessons learned and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…99,100 In studies on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus, 101,102 it has been shown that the substantially larger genome-scale 13C-MFA models achieved better fits to the labeling data, that these reductions in SSR were statistically justified, and that the original models of core metabolism underestimated the uncertainty in a number of flux estimates by ignoring alternative metabolic pathways that could also explain patterns in the labeling data. 100 The examples above demonstrate that rather than being a statistical curi- This method does not work when the DOF of the compared models are different, as increasing the DOF in a model inevitably allows it to fit a given data set better. This may be accounted for informally by noting the change in DOF (e.g., 94 ) or in a more statistically rigorous way using the extra-sum-of-squares test 103,104 or information criteria.…”
Section: Model Selection In 13c-mfamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…99,100 In studies on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus, 101,102 it has been shown that the substantially larger genome-scale 13C-MFA models achieved better fits to the labeling data, that these reductions in SSR were statistically justified, and that the original models of core metabolism underestimated the uncertainty in a number of flux estimates by ignoring alternative metabolic pathways that could also explain patterns in the labeling data. 100 The examples above demonstrate that rather than being a statistical curi- This method does not work when the DOF of the compared models are different, as increasing the DOF in a model inevitably allows it to fit a given data set better. This may be accounted for informally by noting the change in DOF (e.g., 94 ) or in a more statistically rigorous way using the extra-sum-of-squares test 103,104 or information criteria.…”
Section: Model Selection In 13c-mfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the literature on “Genome‐scale‐13C‐MFA” has provided evidence that the exclusion of many reactions peripheral to the metabolic network under consideration (typically core metabolism) in 13C‐MFA can result in artificially narrow confidence intervals. Genome‐scale‐13C‐MFA involves estimating a flux map by minimizing deviation between predicted and measured isotopic labeling but using the kind of genome‐scale metabolic network more typically used for FBA analyses 99,100 . In studies on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus , 101,102 it has been shown that the substantially larger genome‐scale 13C‐MFA models achieved better fits to the labeling data, that these reductions in SSR were statistically justified, and that the original models of core metabolism underestimated the uncertainty in a number of flux estimates by ignoring alternative metabolic pathways that could also explain patterns in the labeling data 100 .…”
Section: Validation Techniques In Fba and 13c‐mfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the metabolic network and the stoichiometric balanced equation of each reaction, the relationship among the reaction rates was obtained [23,24]. It was assumed that the intermediate metabolites were in a pseudo-steady state such that their concentration change rates were zero.…”
Section: Establishment Of Metabolic Flux Balance Model Of Propionic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, algorithmic advances have led to decreasing the number of simulated variables [e.g. via elementary metabolite units (EMUs)] and expanding the applicability to networks of large size (Gopalakrishnan et al, 2018;Hendry et al, 2020). This workflow for flux estimation from socalled global MFA approaches is well established even for the isotopic nonstationary state and implemented in toolboxes like INCA (Young, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%